Problem Description: incorrect MTU size. Command 'ifconfig eth0' show MTU:1500, but network failed with packet large more than 1024. Modifying the mtu of the ethernet interface to 1024 with command 'ifconfig eth0 mtu 1024' make it to work. Keyword: networking Kernel version Linux ubuntu 2.6.28-14-server, Linux 2.6.29.06-std122
You state that it's a regression. Since which kernel version? In other words, what is the most recent kernel version which is known to not have this bug? And which driver are we talking about? sis900.c?
Sorry for incompleted information. The driver is sis190. Max MTU is 1496. I've reported to bugzilla(9467) http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9467 I've not use this NIC for long time and can't remember what is the most recent kernel version which is known to not have this bug.
(switched to email. Please respond via emailed reply-to-all, not via the bugzilla web interface). On Wed, 29 Jul 2009 08:02:32 GMT bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13862 > > Summary: PROBLEM: SiS 191 mtu bug > Product: Drivers > Version: 2.5 > Kernel Version: 2.6.28-14, 2.6.29-06 > Platform: All > OS/Version: Linux > Tree: Mainline > Status: NEW > Severity: blocking > Priority: P1 > Component: Network > AssignedTo: drivers_network@kernel-bugs.osdl.org > ReportedBy: wipat.s@psu.ac.th > Regression: Yes > > > Problem Description: > incorrect MTU size. Command 'ifconfig eth0' show MTU:1500, > but network failed with packet large more than 1024. > Modifying the mtu of the ethernet interface to 1024 > with command 'ifconfig eth0 mtu 1024' make it to work. > > Keyword: networking > Kernel version Linux ubuntu 2.6.28-14-server, Linux 2.6.29.06-std122 > drivers/net/sis190.c It's a regression, but we're not sure since when.
You said that it was a mtu issue, after you changed it did you have to do anything else because I have changed it multiple times with no success.
(In reply to comment #4) > You said that it was a mtu issue, after you changed it did you have to do > anything else because I have changed it multiple times with no success. I do no more anything.
I think that this is not a regression, I have not been able to see this problem resolved. see bug 10694
Any update on this issue? I want to help, but I need to know what information do you need to resolved.
I think that this is duplicate of Bug 10895. Reported by the same person. So one of them should be closed.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 10895 ***