Bug 19462
Description
Anthony Awtrey
2010-10-01 22:28:51 UTC
Created attachment 32232 [details]
dmesg kernel panic/oops #1
Created attachment 32242 [details]
dmesg kernel panic/oops #2
Created attachment 32252 [details]
dmesg kernel panic/oops #3
Created attachment 32262 [details]
dmesg kernel panic/oops #4
Created attachment 32272 [details]
dmesg kernel panic/oops #5
Created attachment 32282 [details]
dmesg kernel panic/oops #6
Created attachment 32292 [details]
dmesg kernel panic/oops #8
Created attachment 32302 [details]
dmesg kernel panic/oops #9
Created attachment 32312 [details]
dmesg kernel panic/oops #10
Created attachment 32322 [details]
dmesg kernel panic/oops #11
Created attachment 33422 [details]
dmesg for toughbook cf30 mk3 problems
I ahve the same problems on the toughbook cf30-mk3. I also have acpi erros on boot including the EC)_._REG not found error. I added the necessary dmi info in the kernel source and recompiled - the allow the early pdc call. This was working at kernel level but did not change anything. Kernel is very unstable - requiring multiple boots before obtaining a semi-stable platform to be able to get info off. V2.6.33 seems a bit more stable then 2.6.34. I have previously attached a dmesg output, showing the acpi errors. Will attach the dsdt shortly. Have previously been running a cf30 mk2 with no problems. Cheers John Created attachment 33432 [details]
cf30 mk3 dsdt
Extra - in trying to lock this down - I have updated to the latest Panasonic Bios and EC. John ming, would you please look at this issue? Hi, Anthony and John Could you guys have a try mainline kernel? And please attach the acpidump output? Thanks. I have tried a mainline - dmesg-cf30 attached. Also the acpidump results. The ACPI errors are still there. Under the mainline kernel the system wont run X but I expect that this is due to both my config I have set up and the drm and graphic card patches that redhat apply. John Created attachment 33542 [details]
acpi dump from cf30
Created attachment 33552 [details]
Mainline kernel dmesg cf30
ACPI Error (dswload-0677): [DD02] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND ACPI Exception: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20100121/psloop-231) ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\] (Node ffffffff81d94ed0), AE_NOT_FOUND ACPI Error (dswload-0677): [USB0] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND ACPI Exception: AE_NOT_FOUND, During name lookup/catalog (20100121/psloop-231) ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\] (Node ffffffff81d94ed0), AE_NOT_FOUND ACPI: Executed 3 blocks of module-level executable AML code ACPI Error (psargs-0359): [\_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.DD02.CUBL] Namespace lookup failure, AE_NOT_FOUND ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.INIG] (Node ffff880074d446c0), AE_NOT_FOUND ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_SB_.PCI0.LPCB.EC0_._REG] (Node ffff880074d42d40), AE_NOT_FOUND \_SB_.PCI0.GFX0.DD02.CUBL is created in the module level code, but seems module level code is not executed correctly. Thanks for the info, I'm looking at this issue. Sorry I took so long to respond. I have now built the latest mainline (2.6.35.7) and tested it on the following platforms: cf-19m4 - ACPI errors, but no panic/oops anymore cf-74m4 - ACPI errors, but no panic/oops anymore cf-30m2 - ACPI errors and still seeing oops/panics I'll upload the dmesg and acpidump from each model momentarily. Thanks for looking into this! I've been working with some US-based Panasonic field engineers if there is something you might want me to try to get from them. Tony Created attachment 33582 [details]
acpidump output from cf-19m4
Created attachment 33592 [details]
dmesg output from cf-19m
Created attachment 33602 [details]
acpidump output from cf-74m4
Created attachment 33612 [details]
dmesg output from cf-74m4
Created attachment 33622 [details]
acpidump output from cf-30m2
Created attachment 33632 [details]
dmesg output from cf-30m2
Hi, Anthony Here are 2 issues, 1. ACPI errors I have found the root cause, see comment #20, I'm working on the fix 2. oops/panics [ 20.236238] ACPI Error: Target is not a Reference or Constant object - Integer [f70e8cf8] (20100428/exstore-136) [ 20.236255] ACPI Error (psparse-0537): Method parse/execution failed [\_PR_.CPU0._CST] (Node f7026b58), AE_AML_OPERAND_TYPE [ 20.336525] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 52505f60 [ 20.337941] IP: [<c03a10cb>] acpi_ns_check_object_type+0x39/0x208 The _CST method is in some dynamic table, described as below Name (SSDT, Package (0x0C) { "CPU0IST ", 0x77A09C98, 0x00000223, "APIST ", 0x77A08E18, 0x000001CF, "CPU0CST ", 0x77A07598, 0x00000546, "APCST ", 0x77A09F18, 0x0000008D }) Would you please also attach these tables? acpidump --addr 0x77A09C98 --length 0x223 > CPU0IST.dat acpidump --addr 0x77A08E18 --length 0x1CF > APIST.dat acpidump --addr 0x77A07598 --length 0x546 > CPU0CST.dat acpidump --addr 0x77A09F18 --length 0x8D > APCST.dat Created attachment 33722 [details]
CPU0IST.dat as requested
Created attachment 33732 [details]
APIST.dat as requested
Created attachment 33742 [details]
CPU0CST.dat as requested
Created attachment 33752 [details]
APCST.dat as requested
Created attachment 33902 [details]
patch to fix ACPI errors
Bob wrote a patch to fix the ACPI errors.
Would you guys give it a try?
Thanks.
CF30-Mk3 Toughbook -> successful results. Applied patch to both the mainline kernel and fedora's distributed kernel and everything worked. Screen backlight adjustment now works!! First time. Dmesg has no acpi errors! The stability of the machine may have been linked to some display bugs which fedora appear to have fixed independently. Thanks. A great result (for me). Now why do these nasties always show up with panasonic machines?? Cheers and Thanks John Success here as well. I got a clean boot and no obvious ACPI errors in dmesg. Thanks very much for the assistance! This issue is closed as far as I am concerned. Tony Thanks for the testing. Mark it as RESOLVED. This is comitted as: commit 8df3fc981dc12d9fdcaef4100a2193b605024d7a Author: Bob Moore <robert.moore@intel.com> Date: Sat Oct 23 01:36:40 2010 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] ACPICA: Fix Scope() op in module level code Is this already marked to be backported for stable? |