Bug 13505 - USB keyboard/mouse unresponsive for few seconds at a time
Summary: USB keyboard/mouse unresponsive for few seconds at a time
Status: RESOLVED INVALID
Alias: None
Product: Drivers
Classification: Unclassified
Component: USB (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: P1 normal
Assignee: Greg Kroah-Hartman
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2009-06-11 09:01 UTC by Marcus Better
Modified: 2009-06-29 14:09 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Kernel Version: 2.6.30
Subsystem:
Regression: Yes
Bisected commit-id:


Attachments
kernel config (70.58 KB, text/plain)
2009-06-11 09:01 UTC, Marcus Better
Details
output of lspci -v (9.31 KB, text/plain)
2009-06-11 09:02 UTC, Marcus Better
Details

Description Marcus Better 2009-06-11 09:01:02 UTC
Created attachment 21850 [details]
kernel config

After upgrading from 2.6.29.4, the USB-attached Logitech keyboard and mouse started losing key presses and mouse events. It occasionally ignores all keystrokes and mouse events for 5-10 seconds at a time. Then it just starts working again. It happens a few times per minute.

The built-in keyboard continues to work all the time. This is a Thinkpad T61 running Linux x86_64, Debian, X.org 1.6.1.901, Intel X.org driver 2.7.99.1 with KMS.
Comment 1 Marcus Better 2009-06-11 09:02:33 UTC
Created attachment 21851 [details]
output of lspci -v
Comment 2 Diego Calleja 2009-06-13 17:22:24 UTC
Any strange message in dmesg?
Comment 3 Marcus Better 2009-06-15 07:57:32 UTC
(In reply to comment #2)
> Any strange message in dmesg?

Yes, I see messages about auto-suspend. When I start using the keyboard, I get:

Jun 15 09:53:07 better kernel: uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: release dev 2 ep81-INT, period 8, phase 4, 118 us
Jun 15 09:53:07 better kernel: uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: release dev 2 ep82-INT, period 8, phase 4, 118 us
Jun 15 09:53:07 better kernel: usb 5-1: usb auto-suspend
Jun 15 09:53:09 better kernel: hub 5-0:1.0: hub_suspend
Jun 15 09:53:09 better kernel: usb usb5: bus auto-suspend
Jun 15 09:53:09 better kernel: usb usb5: suspend_rh
Jun 15 09:53:10 better kernel: usb usb5: usb resume
Jun 15 09:53:10 better kernel: usb usb5: wakeup_rh
Jun 15 09:53:10 better kernel: hub 5-0:1.0: hub_resume
Jun 15 09:53:10 better kernel: uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: port 1 portsc 01a5,01
Jun 15 09:53:10 better kernel: hub 5-0:1.0: port 1: status 0303 change 0004
Jun 15 09:53:10 better kernel: hub 5-0:1.0: state 7 ports 2 chg 0002 evt 0000
Jun 15 09:53:10 better kernel: uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: port 1 portsc 01a5,01
Jun 15 09:53:10 better kernel: usb 5-1: usb wakeup-resume
Jun 15 09:53:10 better kernel: usb 5-1: finish resume
Jun 15 09:53:10 better kernel: uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: reserve dev 2 ep81-INT, period 8, phase 4, 118 us
Jun 15 09:53:10 better kernel: uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: reserve dev 2 ep82-INT, period 8, phase 4, 118 us
Jun 15 09:53:10 better kernel: hub 5-0:1.0: resume on port 1, status 0
Jun 15 09:53:10 better kernel: hub 5-0:1.0: port 1, status 0303, change 0004, 1.5 Mb/s

After a few seconds the keyboard stops working and I get this:

Jun 15 09:53:16 better kernel: uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: release dev 2 ep81-INT, period 8, phase 4, 118 us
Jun 15 09:53:16 better kernel: uhci_hcd 0000:00:1d.0: release dev 2 ep82-INT, period 8, phase 4, 118 us
Jun 15 09:53:16 better kernel: usb 5-1: usb auto-suspend
Jun 15 09:53:18 better kernel: hub 5-0:1.0: hub_suspend
Jun 15 09:53:18 better kernel: usb usb5: bus auto-suspend
Jun 15 09:53:18 better kernel: usb usb5: suspend_rh
Comment 4 Marcus Better 2009-06-15 08:32:20 UTC
The problem seems to go away if autosuspend is disabled for the hub with "echo on > /sys/bus/usb/devices/5-1/power/level".

I find this comment from Documentation/usb/power-management.txt interesting:

>Sometimes it turns out that even when a device does work okay with
>autosuspend there are still problems.  For example, there are
>experimental patches adding autosuspend support to the usbhid driver,
>which manages keyboards and mice, among other things.  Tests with a
>number of keyboards showed that typing on a suspended keyboard, while
>causing the keyboard to do a remote wakeup all right, would
>nonetheless frequently result in lost keystrokes.

lsusb output:

Bus 007 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 006 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 004 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 005 Device 002: ID 046d:c512 Logitech, Inc. LX-700 Cordless Desktop Receiver
Bus 005 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 003 Device 004: ID 0a5c:2110 Broadcom Corp. Bluetooth Controller
Bus 003 Device 003: ID 0483:2016 SGS Thomson Microelectronics Fingerprint Reader
Bus 003 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0001 Linux Foundation 1.1 root hub
Bus 002 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Bus 001 Device 001: ID 1d6b:0002 Linux Foundation 2.0 root hub
Comment 5 Alan Stern 2009-06-22 19:49:10 UTC
An interesting question is how the power/level value got changed from "on" (the default) to "auto" in the first place.  Is there a udev script which does it?  If there is, it should be possible to disable the script.
Comment 6 Andrew Morton 2009-06-22 21:06:57 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> An interesting question is how the power/level value got changed from "on"
> (the
> default) to "auto" in the first place.  Is there a udev script which does it? 
> If there is, it should be possible to disable the script.

That'll probably be hard to work out.  Perhaps add a bit of debug code to the kernel which tells us when something enables auto mode?  Print the pid and ->comm?
Comment 7 Alan Stern 2009-06-22 21:22:45 UTC
Marcus, if you want to try that, look at the code in set_level() in drivers/usb/core/sysfs.c where buf is compared with auto_string.
Comment 8 Marcus Better 2009-06-23 10:37:22 UTC
(In reply to comment #5)
> An interesting question is how the power/level value got changed from "on" 
> (the default) to "auto" in the first place.  Is there a udev script which 
> does it? 

Indeed there is. I overlooked it at first since it was in /lib/udev rather than /etc/udev. I installed it myself last year... I guess autosuspend functionality for keyboards was recently enabled in the kernel, since I didn't have any problems before.
Comment 9 Michael Reinsch 2009-06-29 13:44:23 UTC
same problem here; I had usb autosuspend enabled and had no issues with my USB keyboard and mouse before 2.6.30.
Comment 10 Michael Reinsch 2009-06-29 13:46:27 UTC
so why is this invalid? Shouldn't USB auto suspend work correctly in a sense that it doesn't interrupt the device's usual functionality?
Comment 11 Alan Stern 2009-06-29 14:09:44 UTC
On Mon, 29 Jun 2009 bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> so why is this invalid? Shouldn't USB auto suspend work correctly in a sense
> that it doesn't interrupt the device's usual functionality?

Of course it should.  But in some cases the hardware doesn't allow it 
-- and the HID spec allows mice to behave in this braindead way.
Furthermore, there's no way for the kernel to tell whether or not a 
mouse will wake up when it is moved.

So there's nothing we can do about it.  The problem is in the mouse,
not in the kernel.  The solution is: If your mouse doesn't support
remote wakeup properly, then don't enable autosuspend.

Alan Stern

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.