Bug 10644 - WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c:122 in 2.6.26-rc1
Summary: WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c:122 in 2.6.26-rc1
Status: REJECTED DOCUMENTED
Alias: None
Product: Platform Specific/Hardware
Classification: Unclassified
Component: x86-64 (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: P1 normal
Assignee: platform_x86_64@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2008-05-08 14:08 UTC by Rafael J. Wysocki
Modified: 2008-09-04 13:02 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Kernel Version: 2.6.26-rc1
Subsystem:
Regression: ---
Bisected commit-id:


Attachments

Description Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-05-08 14:08:27 UTC
Subject    : WARNING: at arch/x86/kernel/rtc.c:122 in 2.6.26-rc1
Submitter  : Mirco Tischler <mt-ml@gmx.de>
Date       : 2008-05-07 20:05
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/7/185
Handled-By : Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Handled-By : Andi Kleen <andi@firstfloor.org>

This entry is being used for tracking a regression from 2.6.25.  Please don't
close it until the problem is fixed in the mainline.
Comment 1 Thomas Gleixner 2008-05-08 23:58:54 UTC
Why is this a regression ?

Thanks,
	tglx
Comment 2 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-05-09 05:53:52 UTC
On Friday, 9 of May 2008, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10644
>  
> ------- Comment #1 from tglx@linutronix.de  2008-05-08 23:58 -------
> Why is this a regression ?

Well, I assumed it didn't happen with the previous kernel(s).  Mirco?
Comment 3 Anonymous Emailer 2008-05-09 06:35:35 UTC
Reply-To: mt-ml@gmx.de

On Fr, 2008-05-09 at 14:53 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 9 of May 2008, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10644
> >  
> > ------- Comment #1 from tglx@linutronix.de  2008-05-08 23:58 -------
> > Why is this a regression ?
> 
> Well, I assumed it didn't happen with the previous kernel(s).  Mirco?
Indeed. As it happened only once. I've tried to reconstruct the
circumstances that triggered it, but wasn't able to see it again. So I
assume it was some weird hardware problem atm. Will observe further
though.
Comment 4 Thomas Gleixner 2008-05-09 06:57:10 UTC
On Fri, 9 May 2008, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> On Friday, 9 of May 2008, bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10644
> >  
> > ------- Comment #1 from tglx@linutronix.de  2008-05-08 23:58 -------
> > Why is this a regression ?
> 
> Well, I assumed it didn't happen with the previous kernel(s).  Mirco?

This is an informational warning which is new. That's not a BUG or in
any way creating trouble. We have ignored the BIN mode bit for 15
years in Linux due to hardcoding ALWAYS_BCD=1 which removes all the
BIN mode pathes at compile time already. The reason for this WARN_ON
was to gather information whether there are any machines which have
the RTC configured in BIN mode. This particular machine showed the BIN
mode flag once and it looks like a hardware glitch.

Thanks,
	tglx
Comment 5 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-05-09 07:56:30 UTC
Dropping from the list of recent regressions.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.