In kernel-4.0.3/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c: In function ‘describe_obj’:

   142          list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma_list, vma_link)
   143                  if (vma->pin_count > 0)
   144                          pin_count++;
   145                  seq_printf(m, " (pinned x %d)", pin_count);

the "seq_printf" at line 145 is indented as if guarded within the "list_for_each_entry" at line 142.

My reading of the code is that it's meant to be after the loop, rather than within it.  The compiler treats it as after, hence I think this indentation snafu is benign, if misleading.

Seen via an experimental new gcc warning I'm working on for gcc 6, -Wmisleading-indentation, using gcc r223098 adding -Werror=misleading-indentation" to KBUILD_CFLAGS in Makefile, where the experimental gcc emits this error:

drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c: In function ‘describe_obj’:
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c:145:3: error: statement is indented as if it were guarded by... [-Werror=misleading-indentation]
   seq_printf(m, " (pinned x %d)", pin_count);
   ^
In file included from include/linux/mutex.h:14:0,
                 from include/linux/seq_file.h:7,
                 from drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c:29:
include/linux/list.h:447:2: note: ...this ‘for’ clause, but it is not
  for (pos = list_first_entry(head, typeof(*pos), member); \
  ^
drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_debugfs.c:142:2: note: in expansion of macro ‘list_for_each_entry’
  list_for_each_entry(vma, &obj->vma_list, vma_link)
  ^

Hope this is constructive