Bug 4923 - Warning: Encountered executable code at module level, [AE_NOT_CONFIGURED]
Warning: Encountered executable code at module level, [AE_NOT_CONFIGURED]
Product: ACPI
Classification: Unclassified
Component: ACPICA-Core
i386 Linux
: P2 normal
Assigned To: Robert Moore
Depends on:
  Show dependency treegraph
Reported: 2005-07-21 17:46 UTC by Martin Mokrejs
Modified: 2006-09-28 13:15 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Kernel Version: 2.6.13-rc3-git2
Tree: Mainline
Regression: ---

dmesg-2.6.13-rc3-git2 (15.20 KB, text/plain)
2005-07-21 17:47 UTC, Martin Mokrejs
patch vs 2.6.13-rc5 (731 bytes, patch)
2005-08-03 20:14 UTC, Len Brown
Details | Diff

Description Martin Mokrejs 2005-07-21 17:46:41 UTC
Distribution: Gentoo
Hardware Environment: ASUS P4C800E-Deluxe, bios 1.19
Software Environment:
Problem Description:

CPU0: Thermal monitoring enabled
mtrr: v2.0 (20020519)
CPU: Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 3.00GHz stepping 09
Enabling fast FPU save and restore... done.
Enabling unmasked SIMD FPU exception support... done.
Checking 'hlt' instruction... OK.
    ACPI-0498: *** Warning: Encountered executable code at module level,
    ACPI-0498: *** Warning: Encountered executable code at module level,
    ACPI-0498: *** Warning: Encountered executable code at module level,
..TIMER: vector=0x31 pin1=2 pin2=-1
NET: Registered protocol family 16
ACPI: bus type pci registered
PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xf0031, last bus=3
PCI: Using configuration type 1
ACPI: Subsystem revision 20050408

Steps to reproduce:
Comment 1 Martin Mokrejs 2005-07-21 17:47:34 UTC
Created attachment 5359 [details]
Comment 2 Martin Mokrejs 2005-07-21 19:25:44 UTC
Problem is still present in 2.6.13-rc3-git4 but disappears with acpi-20050708
patch. Hope you'll manage to push your patch tree into mainstream kernel soon. ;-)
Comment 3 Len Brown 2005-08-03 19:42:20 UTC
Unfortunately support for module level code had to get
backed out as of 20050729, so I think this message will come back.

Do you see this in a vanilla latest 2.6.13-rc5 or later?
We should probably just delete the warning for 2.6.13/
Comment 4 Len Brown 2005-08-03 20:14:00 UTC
Created attachment 5498 [details]
patch vs 2.6.13-rc5

patch to delete the warning,
users will not know what to do with it anyway.
We're working on the module level code issue
and will try to roll it out soon.
Comment 5 Martin Mokrejs 2005-08-03 22:35:26 UTC
Yes, I see it still on vanilla 2.6.13-rc5. I haven't tried latest acpi patch
over it yet.
Comment 6 Len Brown 2005-08-04 13:16:26 UTC
fix is in Linus' git-tree as of today.  Closing.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.