Kernel Bug Tracker – Bug 22092
Kernel v2.6.36 trouble on USB disconnect
Last modified: 2012-06-14 17:34:56 UTC
Subject : Kernel v2.6.36 trouble on USB disconnect
Submitter : Ketil Froyn <email@example.com>
Date : 2010-10-29 8:05
Message-ID : AANLkTik5qVxkEGVAA1PSOGk2KTW+ekHpSwttsQEWzWjfirstname.lastname@example.org
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128833956503607&w=2
This entry is being used for tracking a regression from 2.6.35. Please don't
close it until the problem is fixed in the mainline.
This bug is misclassified. It is a problem with the block layer (or possibly the SCSI layer) and has nothing to do with USB. It should be reassigned.
On Sunday, December 19, 2010, Heinz Diehl wrote:
> On 19.12.2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.35 and 2.6.36.
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.35 and 2.6.36. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way).
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=22092
> > Subject : Kernel v2.6.36 trouble on USB disconnect
> > Submitter : Ketil Froyn <email@example.com>
> > Date : 2010-10-29 8:05 (52 days old)
> > Message-ID : <AANLkTik5qVxkEGVAA1PSOGk2KTW+ekHpSwttsQEWzWjfirstname.lastname@example.org>
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128833956503607&w=2
> I guess this may be a duplicate of this one:
Closing as a duplicate.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 24722 ***
On Sun, 19 Dec 2010 email@example.com wrote:
> --- Comment #4 from Rafael J. Wysocki <firstname.lastname@example.org> 2010-12-19 14:48:12 ---
> Closing as a duplicate.
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 24722 ***
Are you sure about this? The error messages don't look at all similar.
The error for bug #24722 is a WARN_ONCE in ehci_endpoint_reset(),
whereas the error in this bug report is some unspecified problem in
Not at all, I wanted someone more familiar with the code in question to
speak up. :-)
Is this still a problem on 2.6.38.y?