Up til 6.9.10, I would see these errors every boot *twice*: ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PC00.LPCB.HEC.TSR1], AE_NOT_FOUND (20230628/psargs-330) ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PC00.LPCB.H_EC.SEN1._TMP due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20230628/psparse-529) (they do get occasionally repeated again) and these *once*: thermal thermal_zone2: failed to read out thermal zone (-5) thermal thermal_zone7: failed to read out thermal zone (-61) But since the distro I use (Arch) has moved on to 6.10, these are spammed *non-stop*: ACPI BIOS Error (bug): Could not resolve symbol [\_SB.PC00.LPCB.HEC.TSR1], AE_NOT_FOUND (20240322/psargs-330) ACPI Error: Aborting method \_SB.PC00.LPCB.H_EC.SEN1._TMP due to previous error (AE_NOT_FOUND) (20240322/psparse-529) thermal thermal_zone1: failed to read out thermal zone (-5) in the frequency of *three to four times per second*. For the record, this is now consecutively repeated 5 times every boot as well: thermal thermal_zone7: failed to read out thermal zone (-61) But at least this one would stop.
Would be great if you performed git bisect: https://docs.kernel.org/admin-guide/bug-bisect.html
(In reply to Artem S. Tashkinov from comment #1) > Would be great if you performed git bisect: No need to, the problem is known[1] and a fix heading towards mainline: https://lore.kernel.org/linux-pm/2348857.ElGaqSPkdT@rjwysocki.net/ [1] a quick search on lore would have found existing reports and breadcrumbs to the fix; Artem, it IMHO would be good if you could do a quick search before asking people to bisect, as that is a huge effort for many people
(In reply to The Linux kernel's regression tracker (Thorsten Leemhuis) from comment #2) > Artem, it IMHO would be good if you could do a quick search > before asking people to bisect, as that is a huge effort for many people Searching LKML is anything but easy due to an insane amount of posts. And the message you've cited needs to be carefully read and comprehended to realize that it's indeed connected to this bug report. Would be great if Linux had two mailing lists: one solely for patches (and patches discussion) and the other one for any other discussions (regressions, ideas, talks) but I can only dream.