Bug 218496 - Possible kafs related regression "rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU"
Summary: Possible kafs related regression "rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on...
Status: RESOLVED CODE_FIX
Alias: None
Product: File System
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Other (show other bugs)
Hardware: All Linux
: P3 normal
Assignee: fs_other
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2024-02-15 11:32 UTC by Markus Suvanto
Modified: 2024-02-23 13:21 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Kernel Version: 6.7.4
Subsystem:
Regression: Yes
Bisected commit-id:


Attachments

Description Markus Suvanto 2024-02-15 11:32:08 UTC
Compiling code under /afs filesystem  using make causes hang
For me, this is regression and the latest working version was 6.7.2.
I have not bisected this but first not working version was 6.7.3.



69815.691207] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU
[69815.691212] rcu: 	1-....: (17999 ticks this GP) idle=e61c/1/0x4000000000000000 softirq=2073613/2073613 fqs=5872
[69815.691216] rcu: 	(t=18000 jiffies g=3239965 q=24582 ncpus=4)
[69815.691218] CPU: 1 PID: 132851 Comm: make Not tainted 6.7.4 #1
[69815.691220] Hardware name: LENOVO 20HF0047MX/20HF0047MX, BIOS N1WET68W (1.47 ) 07/21/2022
[69815.691221] RIP: 0010:strnlen+0x12/0x30
[69815.691225] Code: 48 83 c0 01 80 38 00 75 f7 48 29 f8 c3 31 c0 c3 0f 1f 84 00 00 00 00 00 48 8d 14 37 48 85 f6 48 89 f8 75 0b eb 19 48 83 c0 01 <48> 39 c2 74 09 80 38 00 75 f2 48 29 f8 c3 48 89 d0 48 29 f8 c3 31
[69815.691227] RSP: 0018:ffffb2d10bab3d20 EFLAGS: 00000296
[69815.691229] RAX: ffff96cc13441730 RBX: ffff96cc1344172c RCX: 00000000000000ff
[69815.691230] RDX: ffff96cc1344180c RSI: 00000000000000e0 RDI: ffff96cc1344172c
[69815.691231] RBP: 0000000000000039 R08: 0000000000000034 R09: 00000000000000ff
[69815.691232] R10: ffff96c7174db240 R11: 0000000000000039 R12: 000000000000003f
[69815.691233] R13: ffff96cc13441000 R14: ffffb2d10bab3e30 R15: 0000000000000039
[69815.691234] FS:  00007f07daa03740(0000) GS:ffff96cc46680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[69815.691235] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[69815.691236] CR2: 00005558841be002 CR3: 000000011222b006 CR4: 00000000003706f0
[69815.691237] Call Trace:
[69815.691239]  <IRQ>
[69815.691240]  ? rcu_dump_cpu_stacks+0xef/0x170
[69815.691244]  ? rcu_sched_clock_irq+0x4ad/0xa60
[69815.691246]  ? update_process_times+0x56/0x90
[69815.691248]  ? tick_nohz_highres_handler+0x86/0xa0
[69815.691250]  ? tick_sched_do_timer+0x80/0x80
[69815.691252]  ? __hrtimer_run_queues+0xec/0x190
[69815.691254]  ? hrtimer_interrupt+0xef/0x220
[69815.691256]  ? __sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x38/0x90
[69815.691259]  ? sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x69/0x90
[69815.691261]  </IRQ>
[69815.691262]  <TASK>
[69815.691262]  ? asm_sysvec_apic_timer_interrupt+0x16/0x20
[69815.691265]  ? strnlen+0x12/0x30
[69815.691268]  afs_dir_iterate+0x5a3/0xb40 [kafs]
[69815.691276]  ? __mod_memcg_lruvec_state+0x7d/0xd0
[69815.691279]  ? __mod_lruvec_page_state+0x76/0xf0
[69815.691281]  ? folio_add_new_anon_rmap+0x3c/0xb0
[69815.691283]  afs_readdir+0x2b/0x50 [kafs]
[69815.691289]  iterate_dir+0x75/0x120
[69815.691292]  __x64_sys_getdents64+0x7f/0x120
[69815.691295]  ? fillonedir+0x110/0x110
[69815.691297]  do_syscall_64+0x56/0xd0
[69815.691299]  ? __count_memcg_events+0x39/0x80
[69815.691301]  ? handle_mm_fault+0x94/0x320
[69815.691303]  ? exc_page_fault+0x33c/0x5c0
[69815.691306]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e
[69815.691311] RIP: 0033:0x7f07daac43a3
[69815.691313] Code: 89 df e8 d0 4b fc ff 48 83 c4 08 48 89 e8 5b 5d c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 b8 ff ff ff 7f 48 39 c2 48 0f 47 d0 b8 d9 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 05 c3 0f 1f 40 00 48 8b 15 51 5a 0f 00 f7 d8
[69815.691314] RSP: 002b:00007ffe0b56b1e8 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000d9
[69815.691315] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005558841bd640 RCX: 00007f07daac43a3
[69815.691316] RDX: 0000000000008000 RSI: 00005558841bd670 RDI: 0000000000000003
[69815.691317] RBP: 00005558841bd670 R08: 0000000005f77196 R09: 0000000000000004
[69815.691318] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: ffffffffffffff88
[69815.691319] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000055588340b093 R15: 00000000ffffffff
[69815.691321]  </TASK>
[69911.272520] rcu: INFO: rcu_sched detected expedited stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 1-.... } 18432 jiffies s: 26361 root: 0x2/.
[69911.272529] rcu: blocking rcu_node structures (internal RCU debug):
[69911.272531] Sending NMI from CPU 3 to CPUs 1:
[69911.272535] NMI backtrace for cpu 1
[69911.272536] CPU: 1 PID: 132851 Comm: make Not tainted 6.7.4 #1
[69911.272539] Hardware name: LENOVO 20HF0047MX/20HF0047MX, BIOS N1WET68W (1.47 ) 07/21/2022
[69911.272539] RIP: 0010:afs_dir_iterate+0x58e/0xb40 [kafs]
[69911.272552] Code: e8 67 6b d0 e0 e9 2a fb ff ff be 01 00 00 00 4c 89 e7 e8 55 6b d0 e0 e9 18 fb ff ff 44 89 fd be 40 00 00 00 48 89 e8 48 29 ee <48> c1 e0 05 48 c1 e6 05 49 8d 5c 05 0c 48 89 df e8 0d f1 03 e1 48
[69911.272553] RSP: 0018:ffffb2d10bab3d28 EFLAGS: 00000216
[69911.272555] RAX: 0000000000000025 RBX: ffff96cc1344146c RCX: 00000000000000ff
[69911.272556] RDX: ffff96cc1344180c RSI: 000000000000001b RDI: 0000000000000001
[69911.272557] RBP: 0000000000000025 R08: 0000000000000025 R09: 00000000000000ff
[69911.272558] R10: ffff96c7174db240 R11: 0000000000000025 R12: 000000000000003f
[69911.272558] R13: ffff96cc13441000 R14: ffffb2d10bab3e30 R15: 0000000000000025
[69911.272559] FS:  00007f07daa03740(0000) GS:ffff96cc46680000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[69911.272561] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033
[69911.272562] CR2: 00005558841be002 CR3: 000000011222b006 CR4: 00000000003706f0
[69911.272563] Call Trace:
[69911.272565]  <NMI>
[69911.272566]  ? nmi_cpu_backtrace+0x80/0xf0
[69911.272569]  ? nmi_cpu_backtrace_handler+0x8/0x10
[69911.272571]  ? nmi_handle+0x4b/0xe0
[69911.272573]  ? default_do_nmi+0x40/0x210
[69911.272576]  ? exc_nmi+0xeb/0x110
[69911.272577]  ? end_repeat_nmi+0xf/0x18
[69911.272579]  ? afs_dir_iterate+0x58e/0xb40 [kafs]
[69911.272587]  ? afs_dir_iterate+0x58e/0xb40 [kafs]
[69911.272595]  ? afs_dir_iterate+0x58e/0xb40 [kafs]
[69911.272602]  </NMI>
[69911.272603]  <TASK>
[69911.272604]  ? __mod_memcg_lruvec_state+0x7d/0xd0
[69911.272606]  ? __mod_lruvec_page_state+0x76/0xf0
[69911.272609]  ? folio_add_new_anon_rmap+0x3c/0xb0
[69911.272611]  afs_readdir+0x2b/0x50 [kafs]
[69911.272618]  iterate_dir+0x75/0x120
[69911.272622]  __x64_sys_getdents64+0x7f/0x120
[69911.272624]  ? fillonedir+0x110/0x110
[69911.272626]  do_syscall_64+0x56/0xd0
[69911.272628]  ? __count_memcg_events+0x39/0x80
[69911.272631]  ? handle_mm_fault+0x94/0x320
[69911.272633]  ? exc_page_fault+0x33c/0x5c0
[69911.272635]  entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x46/0x4e
[69911.272638] RIP: 0033:0x7f07daac43a3
[69911.272639] Code: 89 df e8 d0 4b fc ff 48 83 c4 08 48 89 e8 5b 5d c3 66 0f 1f 44 00 00 b8 ff ff ff 7f 48 39 c2 48 0f 47 d0 b8 d9 00 00 00 0f 05 <48> 3d 00 f0 ff ff 77 05 c3 0f 1f 40 00 48 8b 15 51 5a 0f 00 f7 d8
[69911.272641] RSP: 002b:00007ffe0b56b1e8 EFLAGS: 00000293 ORIG_RAX: 00000000000000d9
[69911.272642] RAX: ffffffffffffffda RBX: 00005558841bd640 RCX: 00007f07daac43a3
[69911.272643] RDX: 0000000000008000 RSI: 00005558841bd670 RDI: 0000000000000003
[69911.272644] RBP: 00005558841bd670 R08: 0000000005f77196 R09: 0000000000000004
[69911.272645] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000293 R12: ffffffffffffff88
[69911.272646] R13: 0000000000000000 R14: 000055588340b093 R15: 00000000ffffffff

etc....
Comment 1 Markus Suvanto 2024-02-15 19:05:38 UTC
From: Jeffrey Altman
This commit is the fix for the mentioned issue.

commit fe92f874f09145a6951deacaa4961390238bbe0d
Author: Michael Lass <bevan@bi-co.net>
Date:   Wed Jan 31 16:52:20 2024 +0100

     net: Fix from address in memcpy_to_iter_csum()

     While inlining csum_and_memcpy() into memcpy_to_iter_csum(), the from
     address passed to csum_partial_copy_nocheck() was accidentally changed.
     This causes a regression in applications using UDP, as for example
     OpenAFS, causing loss of datagrams.
Comment 2 David Howells 2024-02-23 13:21:12 UTC
This is almost certainly not the actual fix.  The actual fix is probably this:

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-fsdevel/786185.1708694102@warthog.procyon.org.uk/T/#u

    If a directory has a block with only ".__afsXXXX" files in it (from
    uncompleted silly-rename), these .__afsXXXX files are skipped but without
    advancing the file position in the dir_context.  This leads to
    afs_dir_iterate() repeating the block again and again.

    Fix this by making the code that skips the .__afsXXXX file also manually
    advance the file position.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.