The Elantech Touchscreen is not working in Lenovo Ideapad 5 15. [ 0.550596] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: i2c-ELAN0001:00 supply vcc33 not found, using dummy regulator [ 0.551836] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: i2c-ELAN0001:00 supply vccio not found, using dummy regulator [ 0.560932] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: elants_i2c_send failed (77 77 77 77): -121 [ 0.562427] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: software reset failed: -121 [ 0.595925] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: elants_i2c_send failed (77 77 77 77): -121 [ 0.597974] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: software reset failed: -121 [ 0.621893] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: elants_i2c_send failed (77 77 77 77): -121 [ 0.622504] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: software reset failed: -121 [ 0.632650] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: elants_i2c_send failed (4d 61 69 6e): -121 [ 0.634256] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: boot failed: -121 [ 0.699212] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: invalid 'hello' packet: 00 00 ff ff [ 1.630506] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: Failed to read fw id: -121 [ 1.645508] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: unknown packet 00 00 ff ff When booting a test Windows10 (sorry..), it works; so a HW fault can be excluded. When using it, it produces errors: [ 933.159820] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: unknown packet 0e 00 04 03 [ 933.167034] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: unknown packet 0e 00 04 03 [ 933.172617] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: unknown packet 0e 00 04 13 [ 933.180073] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: unknown packet 0e 00 04 03 [ 933.185652] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: unknown packet 0e 00 04 13 [ 933.192860] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: unknown packet 0e 00 04 03 [ 933.198440] elants_i2c i2c-ELAN0001:00: unknown packet 0e 00 04 13 and so on... Same beheaviour for kernel 5.4.xx and 5.6.xx
2 users of Manjaro reported the same errors on their Lenovo Ideapad 5 manjaro forum report: https://forum.manjaro.org/t/elan-touchpad-not-working/143624 Also strange that its using elants_i2c instead of elan_i2c (or generic ones) but seems similar to https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203467 Maybe its hardware design issue ? I have no idea why "i8042.dumbkbd=1" would help - are these touchpad / elan "touchscreens" connected to I2C and PS2 and SMBus ?
I fixed it temporarily by changing elants_i2c from "built in" to "module". It works flawlessly now. I would not expect a hardware issue. It looks more like the module beeing started too early. The whole I2C is dead, when running elants_i2c as a module.
So effectively you blacklist the module because "The whole I2C is dead, when running elants_i2c as a module." reads for me like elants_i2c no longer manages the touchpad. What driver or connection is that input using now? / What dmesg looks when it finds the touchpad ?
Created attachment 289469 [details] dmesg / kernel log
I fetched a kernel from kernel.org (5.6.14 and 5.7.0-rc7). make menuconfig Device Drivers -> Input device support -> Touchscreens -> Elan eKTH I2C touchscreen -->> set to m rebuild kernel and install... The driver is no longer loaded as built in, but as a module. This leads to a delay of ca. 3-4s. Somehow this seems to help. The Touchpad/screen is connected via i2c1. dl3it@IdeaPad:~$ dmesg | grep ELAN [ 1.583560] i2c_hid i2c-ELAN0001:00: supply vdd not found, using dummy regulator [ 1.583575] i2c_hid i2c-ELAN0001:00: supply vddl not found, using dummy regulator [ 1.646025] input: ELAN0001:00 04F3:3140 Mouse as /devices/platform/AMDI0010:01/i2c-1/i2c-ELAN0001:00/0018:04F3:3140.0001/input/input5 [ 1.646257] input: ELAN0001:00 04F3:3140 Touchpad as /devices/platform/AMDI0010:01/i2c-1/i2c-ELAN0001:00/0018:04F3:3140.0001/input/input6 [ 1.646347] hid-generic 0018:04F3:3140.0001: input,hidraw0: I2C HID v1.00 Mouse [ELAN0001:00 04F3:3140] on i2c-ELAN0001:00 [ 4.456207] input: ELAN0001:00 04F3:3140 Mouse as /devices/platform/AMDI0010:01/i2c-1/i2c-ELAN0001:00/0018:04F3:3140.0001/input/input8 [ 4.456459] input: ELAN0001:00 04F3:3140 Touchpad as /devices/platform/AMDI0010:01/i2c-1/i2c-ELAN0001:00/0018:04F3:3140.0001/input/input9 [ 4.456574] hid-multitouch 0018:04F3:3140.0001: input,hidraw0: I2C HID v1.00 Mouse [ELAN0001:00 04F3:3140] on i2c-ELAN0001:00 dl3it@IdeaPad:~$ xinput ⎡ Virtual core pointer id=2 [master pointer (3)] ⎜ ↳ Virtual core XTEST pointer id=4 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ ELAN0001:00 04F3:3140 Mouse id=11 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ ELAN0001:00 04F3:3140 Touchpad id=12 [slave pointer (2)] ⎣ Virtual core keyboard id=3 [master keyboard (2)] ↳ Virtual core XTEST keyboard id=5 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Power Button id=6 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Video Bus id=7 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Power Button id=8 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Integrated Camera: Integrated C id=9 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Ideapad extra buttons id=10 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ AT Translated Set 2 keyboard id=13 [slave keyboard (3)] libinput: Device: ELAN0001:00 04F3:3140 Mouse Kernel: /dev/input/event5 Group: 8 Seat: seat0, default Capabilities: pointer Tap-to-click: n/a Tap-and-drag: n/a Tap drag lock: n/a Left-handed: disabled Nat.scrolling: disabled Middle emulation: n/a Calibration: n/a Scroll methods: *button Click methods: none Disable-w-typing: n/a Accel profiles: flat *adaptive Rotation: n/a Device: ELAN0001:00 04F3:3140 Touchpad Kernel: /dev/input/event6 Group: 8 Seat: seat0, default Size: 100x66mm Capabilities: pointer gesture Tap-to-click: disabled Tap-and-drag: enabled Tap drag lock: disabled Left-handed: disabled Nat.scrolling: disabled Middle emulation: disabled Calibration: n/a Scroll methods: *two-finger edge Click methods: *button-areas clickfinger Disable-w-typing: enabled Accel profiles: none Rotation: n/a I'll add a dmesg and Xorg log...
Created attachment 289471 [details] Xorg.0.log
In your working log the Touchpad is now using i2c_hid instead of elants_i2c So compiling a new kernel only changed hardware probing order a simple blacklisting of elants_i2c works according to a user on computerbase.de forum that experienced the same issue on his Ideapad 5
thank you for proving logs to help pinpoint the issue
Could you provide some more details on the blacklisting please ? I tried this first, but it didn't work. That's why I recompiled the kernel. Btw, the elants_i2c module is still loaded automatically...
I blacklisted the elants_i2c modul with echo "blacklist elants_i2c" | sudo tee /etc/modprobe.d/unneeded-modules.conf This solved the problem for me.
blacklisting does not work for me with ubuntu kernel and fix built in elants_i2c. I switched back to "my" kernel...
I have a new laptop, Lenovo IdeaPad 5 with AMD Ryzen and I have the same problem. I've installed Ubuntu 20.04, with the 5.4 kernel or even the latest 5.7 kernel the trackpad does not work. I've tried to the solution to blacklist the elants_i2c module, but it did not work for me.
Just tried to build kernel 5.7, as per comment #5, and it works also for me.
Thanks for all the info. I saw these error messages and assumed some larger problem. And didn't register the messages were created by the touchpad actually, since this is the touchscreen driver. And since I managed to brick my HW, I had other things to do (https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/Lenovo-IdeaPad-1xx-3xx-5xx-7xx-Edge-LaVie-Z-Flex-Notebooks/Unbricking-Ideapad-5-15ARE05/m-p/5019541), so I could just test this now. Instead of a kernel rebuild, you can simply unbind the device for the built-in module. Just add some startup script doing: modprobe i2c_hid echo "i2c-ELAN0001:00" > /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/elants_i2c/unbind echo "i2c-ELAN0001:00" > /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/i2c_hid/bind Now I'm wondering, what people with a notebook with an Elan touchscreen would do... The elants_i2c wrongly claims the device. Either a driver bug or a wrong ACPI DSTD, which in the end the elants_i2c must work around :-( And I already had decompiled the ACPI DSTD to have a look...
cool... Works great :-)) Thanks for this...
Just an addition: I added this to my /etc/rc.local, but it doesn't work more times then it does. Currently I'm using this little script, which did work the last few boots: echo "i2c-ELAN0001:00" > /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/elants_i2c/unbind sleep 1.5 echo "i2c-ELAN0001:00" > /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/i2c_hid/bind Anything less then 1.5s didn't work most times. And I'm on Ubuntu 20.04 / kernel 5.4 FWIW. Also tested the 5.6 and 5.7 Ubuntu mainline builds, which had the same problem.
I created /etc/systemd/system/touchscreen.service [Unit] Description=Move touchscreen to correct driver [Service] ExecStart=/etc/tsmove Type=oneshot RemainAfterExit=yes [Install] WantedBy=multi-user.target Add this to systemd environment. It calls /etc/tsmove once at startup. /etc/tsmove #!/bin/bash modprobe i2c_hid echo "i2c-ELAN0001:00" > /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/elants_i2c/unbind echo "i2c-ELAN0001:00" > /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/i2c_hid/bind Works for me perfectly; no issues on Ubuntu 20.04 and kernel 5.4.0-33.
As expected, modifying the kernel per Comment #5 solved the touchpad issue as well (don't have touchscreen on my model).
I can confirm that this script did the trick on a running system: ``` #!/bin/bash modprobe i2c_hid echo "i2c-ELAN0001:00" > /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/elants_i2c/unbind echo "i2c-ELAN0001:00" > /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/i2c_hid/bind ``` What is positive is that: 1) this script fixes the `systemctl suspend`. Without this fix applied the system refused to suspend (go to sleep) with a dmesg: ``` [ 588.472945] PM: dpm_run_callback(): acpi_subsys_suspend+0x0/0x60 returns -16 [ 588.472948] PM: Device i2c-ELAN0001:00 failed to suspend: error -16 [ 588.527849] PM: Some devices failed to suspend, or early wake event detected ``` 2) I have the touchscreen model of this laptop and i can confirm that the touchscreen continues to operate fine next to the working touchpad, after the script is run.
Doesn't seem to work for me. Issue is earlier. I try to point at xinput and result is following : Virtual core pointer id=2 [master pointer (3)] ⎜ ↳ Virtual core XTEST pointer id=4 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ Logitech Pebble Mouse id=14 [slave pointer (2)] ⎣ Virtual core keyboard id=3 [master keyboard (2)] ↳ Virtual core XTEST keyboard id=5 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Power Button id=6 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Video Bus id=7 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Power Button id=8 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Integrated Camera: Integrated C id=9 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Ideapad extra buttons id=10 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Intel HID events id=11 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ Intel HID 5 button array id=12 [slave keyboard (3)] ↳ AT Translated Set 2 keyboard id=13 [slave keyboard (3)] I've no Elan touchpad listed in. My laptop is Lenonvo Ideapad 14IIL05. Have a try to kernel update. But doensn't work much better. Any help to fix my trackpad issue is welcome
(In reply to Osmo from comment #20) > Doesn't seem to work for me. Issue is earlier. ... > I've no Elan touchpad listed in. > My laptop is Lenonvo Ideapad 14IIL05. As far as I have read various Ideapad 14/15 related threads, the AMD (like my 15ARE05) and Intel (like your 14IIL05) have different touchpads. My decoded DSDT contains two "ELAN" ids: ELAN901C and a ELAN0001. I didn't test, if adding that ELAN901C id to the elan_i2c driver would result in some "better" supported device, then the generic i2c_hid driver, as I don't see any missing functionality. And the i2c_hid claims the "ELAN0001" device, if the elants_i2c is build as a module. AFAIK it's common to share a common DSDT for a series of devices, and the correct parts are just activated by some smaller config ACPI data, or the like. There is clearly something missing, because this driver rebinding is even needed in 5.7, as the elan touchscreen driver still claims the device, even if it doesn't have a touchscreen. Eventually, even the DSDT is buggy in some way, but then the driver still needs to work around it. My Xorg.log has some EE entries for invalid values reported by the elants_i2c driver, so it should be possible for the elants_i2c to "bail out" from claiming the device in the detection, based on these values, and the later hid_i2c driver would "just work" - my assumption. (EE) event4 - Elan Touchscreen: kernel bug: device has min == max on ABS_X (II) event4 - Elan Touchscreen: was rejected (II) event4 - not using input device '/dev/input/event4'. (EE) libinput: Elan Touchscreen: Failed to create a device for /dev/input/event4 (EE) PreInit returned 2 for "Elan Touchscreen"
(In reply to Jan-Marek Glogowski from comment #14) > Thanks for all the info. I saw these error messages and assumed some larger > problem. And didn't register the messages were created by the touchpad > actually, since this is the touchscreen driver. > > And since I managed to brick my HW, I had other things to do > (https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/Lenovo-IdeaPad-1xx-3xx-5xx-7xx-Edge-LaVie-Z- > Flex-Notebooks/Unbricking-Ideapad-5-15ARE05/m-p/5019541), so I could just > test this now. > > Instead of a kernel rebuild, you can simply unbind the device for the > built-in module. Just add some startup script doing: > > modprobe i2c_hid > echo "i2c-ELAN0001:00" > /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/elants_i2c/unbind > echo "i2c-ELAN0001:00" > /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/i2c_hid/bind > > Now I'm wondering, what people with a notebook with an Elan touchscreen > would do... > > The elants_i2c wrongly claims the device. Either a driver bug or a wrong > ACPI DSTD, which in the end the elants_i2c must work around :-( > > And I already had decompiled the ACPI DSTD to have a look... Thank you! This script worked for me too. Ideapad 5 AMD Ryzen 7 4500u.
(In reply to dl3it from comment #17) > I created > > /etc/systemd/system/touchscreen.service > > > [Unit] > Description=Move touchscreen to correct driver > > [Service] > ExecStart=/etc/tsmove > Type=oneshot > RemainAfterExit=yes > > [Install] > WantedBy=multi-user.target > > > Add this to systemd environment. > It calls /etc/tsmove once at startup. > > /etc/tsmove > > > #!/bin/bash > modprobe i2c_hid > echo "i2c-ELAN0001:00" > /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/elants_i2c/unbind > echo "i2c-ELAN0001:00" > /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/i2c_hid/bind > > > Works for me perfectly; no issues on Ubuntu 20.04 and kernel 5.4.0-33. I couldn't seem to get this to work. I used this https://linuxconfig.org/how-to-run-script-on-startup-on-ubuntu-20-04-focal-fossa-server-desktop as a guide. Followed all steps and rebooted. Touchpad works now :) Kernel 5.7.5-050705-generic
(In reply to Jan-Marek Glogowski from comment #21) > (In reply to Osmo from comment #20) > > Doesn't seem to work for me. Issue is earlier. > ... > > I've no Elan touchpad listed in. > > My laptop is Lenonvo Ideapad 14IIL05. > > As far as I have read various Ideapad 14/15 related threads, the AMD (like > my 15ARE05) and Intel (like your 14IIL05) have different touchpads. > > My decoded DSDT contains two "ELAN" ids: ELAN901C and a ELAN0001. I didn't > test, if adding that ELAN901C id to the elan_i2c driver would result in some > "better" supported device, then the generic i2c_hid driver, as I don't see > any missing functionality. And the i2c_hid claims the "ELAN0001" device, if > the elants_i2c is build as a module. AFAIK it's common to share a common > DSDT for a series of devices, and the correct parts are just activated by > some smaller config ACPI data, or the like. > > There is clearly something missing, because this driver rebinding is even > needed in 5.7, as the elan touchscreen driver still claims the device, even > if it doesn't have a touchscreen. Eventually, even the DSDT is buggy in some > way, but then the driver still needs to work around it. > > My Xorg.log has some EE entries for invalid values reported by the > elants_i2c driver, so it should be possible for the elants_i2c to "bail out" > from claiming the device in the detection, based on these values, and the > later hid_i2c driver would "just work" - my assumption. > > (EE) event4 - Elan Touchscreen: kernel bug: device has min == max on ABS_X > (II) event4 - Elan Touchscreen: was rejected > (II) event4 - not using input device '/dev/input/event4'. > (EE) libinput: Elan Touchscreen: Failed to create a device for > /dev/input/event4 > (EE) PreInit returned 2 for "Elan Touchscreen" I am also using a 14IIL05 and can confirm that there is no ELAN id shown in the output of xinput, but a MSFT0001:00 04F3:3140 Mouse and MSFT0001:00 04F3:3140 Touchpad. When using Fedora 32 with 5.7.16-200 the Touchpad is working as expected, but the Touchscreen is not working at all (no hardware defect as it works with Windows). I tried the hid-rmi patch for the kernel module as mentioned in comment #41 from https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1887190 but that is not working for me. xinput test shows output for the TouchPad, but nothing for the TouchScreen although it seems recognized as a mouse. Output from Xorg.0.log shows: MSFT0001:00 04F3:3140 Mouse: is tagged by udev as: Mouse Pointingstick Output from lspci: 00:1f.4 SMBus: Intel Corporation Ice Lake-LP SMBus Controller (rev 30) Subsystem: Lenovo Device 3813 Kernel driver in use: i801_smbus Kernel modules: i2c_i801 Output from dmesg: [ 1.397059] i2c_hid i2c-MSFT0001:00: supply vdd not found, using dummy regulator [ 1.397076] i2c_hid i2c-MSFT0001:00: supply vddl not found, using dummy regulator [ 1.419419] input: MSFT0001:00 04F3:3140 Mouse as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:15.0/i2c_designware.0/i2c-0/i2c-MSFT0001:00/0018:04F3:3140.0001/input/input5 [ 1.419549] input: MSFT0001:00 04F3:3140 Touchpad as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:15.0/i2c_designware.0/i2c-0/i2c-MSFT0001:00/0018:04F3:3140.0001/input/input6 [ 1.419621] hid-generic 0018:04F3:3140.0001: input,hidraw0: I2C HID v1.00 Mouse [MSFT0001:00 04F3:3140] on i2c-MSFT0001:00 [ 1.594818] input: MSFT0001:00 04F3:3140 Mouse as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:15.0/i2c_designware.0/i2c-0/i2c-MSFT0001:00/0018:04F3:3140.0001/input/input7 [ 1.594952] input: MSFT0001:00 04F3:3140 Touchpad as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:15.0/i2c_designware.0/i2c-0/i2c-MSFT0001:00/0018:04F3:3140.0001/input/input8 [ 1.595035] hid-multitouch 0018:04F3:3140.0001: input,hidraw0: I2C HID v1.00 Mouse [MSFT0001:00 04F3:3140] on i2c-MSFT0001:00 To me it seems that the TouchPad and TouchScreen is one device, but only the TouchPad is working right now. Can't figure out where it exactly goes wrong and no idea what i could try next. In a clean install of Windows the TouchPad and TouchScreen didn't work and both started working after i installed the driver (Intel Serial-IO (SIO) Driver for Windows 10 (64-bit) - Flex 5-14IIL05, Flex 5-15IIL05). Did someone managed to get the TouchScreen and TouchPad working or knows what to do next?
Hi, I have Legion 15ARH05 with the same Touchpad 04F3:3140. Touchpad is not working either. I am curious why ideapad 15 has the same Touchpad ID and someone could solve the issue by blacklist elan-i2c but Legion 15ARH05 cannot, especially I didn't complied elan-i2c or elants-i2c. Legion 15ARH05 doesn't have touchscreen. dmesg | grep -i 04f3 [ 2.095379] input: MSFT0001:00 04F3:3140 Mouse as /devices/platform/AMDI0010:03/i2c-0/i2c-MSFT0001:00/0018:04F3:3140.0001/input/input16 [ 2.095450] input: MSFT0001:00 04F3:3140 Touchpad as /devices/platform/AMDI0010:03/i2c-0/i2c-MSFT0001:00/0018:04F3:3140.0001/input/input17 [ 2.095506] hid-generic 0018:04F3:3140.0001: input,hidraw0: I2C HID v1.00 Mouse [MSFT0001:00 04F3:3140] on i2c-MSFT0001:00 [ 2.589937] input: MSFT0001:00 04F3:3140 Mouse as /devices/platform/AMDI0010:03/i2c-0/i2c-MSFT0001:00/0018:04F3:3140.0001/input/input19 [ 2.590052] input: MSFT0001:00 04F3:3140 Touchpad as /devices/platform/AMDI0010:03/i2c-0/i2c-MSFT0001:00/0018:04F3:3140.0001/input/input20 [ 2.590112] hid-multitouch 0018:04F3:3140.0001: input,hidraw0: I2C HID v1.00 Mouse [MSFT0001:00 04F3:3140] on i2c-MSFT0001:00
Ideapad Flex 5 14IIL05 i5, 256GB drive, 8GB RAM Touchpad works out of the box, Touch*screen* does not. $ xinput ⎜ ↳ Virtual core XTEST pointer id=4 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ MSFT0001:00 04F3:4140 Mouse id=11 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ MSFT0001:00 04F3:4140 Touchpad id=12 [slave pointer (2)] Shows up twice in xinput; I assume once as touchpad, once as touchscreen, but identified as mouse. Scripts above don't change anything unfortunately, although touchpad keeps working. Haven't tried compiling yet; wasn't sure how to and I doubt it'd help if the driver-changing scripts don't.
I have the same issue as lyntier. xinput ⎡ Virtual core pointer id=2 [master pointer (3)] ⎜ ↳ Virtual core XTEST pointer id=4 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ USB Keyboard Mouse id=14 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ MSFT0001:00 06CB:CE2D Mouse id=16 [slave pointer (2)] ⎜ ↳ MSFT0001:00 06CB:CE2D Touchpad id=17 [slave pointer (2)] I tried adopting the script as following: #!/bin/bash modprobe i2c_hid echo "i2c-MSFT0001:00" > /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/elants_i2c/unbind echo "i2c-MSFT0001:00" > /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/i2c_hid/bind but the service was not able to run due to the script failing: systemctl status touchscreen.service ● touchscreen.service - Move touchscreen to correct driver Loaded: loaded (/etc/systemd/system/touchscreen.service; enabled; vendor preset: enabled) Active: failed (Result: exit-code) since Sun 2020-10-04 19:56:51 CEST; 16min ago Process: 792 ExecStart=/etc/tsmove (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) Main PID: 792 (code=exited, status=1/FAILURE) Oct 04 19:56:51 donat-flex-5 systemd[1]: Starting Move touchscreen to correct driver... Oct 04 19:56:51 donat-flex-5 tsmove[792]: /etc/tsmove: line 3: echo: write error: No such device Oct 04 19:56:51 donat-flex-5 tsmove[792]: /etc/tsmove: line 4: echo: write error: No such device Oct 04 19:56:51 donat-flex-5 systemd[1]: touchscreen.service: Main process exited, code=exited, status=1/FAILURE Oct 04 19:56:51 donat-flex-5 systemd[1]: touchscreen.service: Failed with result 'exit-code'. Oct 04 19:56:51 donat-flex-5 systemd[1]: Failed to start Move touchscreen to correct driver. but dmesg shows that the device is already using i2c_hid: dmesg | grep MSFT [ 0.639245] i2c_hid i2c-MSFT0001:00: i2c-MSFT0001:00 supply vdd not found, using dummy regulator [ 0.639261] i2c_hid i2c-MSFT0001:00: i2c-MSFT0001:00 supply vddl not found, using dummy regulator [ 0.688182] input: MSFT0001:00 06CB:CE2D Mouse as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:15.0/i2c_designware.0/i2c-1/i2c-MSFT0001:00/0018:06CB:CE2D.0001/input/input5 [ 0.688257] input: MSFT0001:00 06CB:CE2D Touchpad as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:15.0/i2c_designware.0/i2c-1/i2c-MSFT0001:00/0018:06CB:CE2D.0001/input/input6 [ 0.688310] hid-generic 0018:06CB:CE2D.0001: input,hidraw0: I2C HID v1.00 Mouse [MSFT0001:00 06CB:CE2D] on i2c-MSFT0001:00 [ 3.164826] input: MSFT0001:00 06CB:CE2D Mouse as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:15.0/i2c_designware.0/i2c-1/i2c-MSFT0001:00/0018:06CB:CE2D.0001/input/input16 [ 3.167199] input: MSFT0001:00 06CB:CE2D Touchpad as /devices/pci0000:00/0000:00:15.0/i2c_designware.0/i2c-1/i2c-MSFT0001:00/0018:06CB:CE2D.0001/input/input17 [ 3.168205] hid-multitouch 0018:06CB:CE2D.0001: input,hidraw0: I2C HID v1.00 Mouse [MSFT0001:00 06CB:CE2D] on i2c-MSFT0001:00 Could anybody please help me? I've installed Linux for the first time and just got this notebook.
To all the Intel *IIL05 users: please open a new bug report and handle the problems with that touchpad / touchscreen in there. It's different HW and needs completely different fixes. Maybe the reporter can update the title of the bug report? ---- The whole bug was originally about the *touchpad* on the AMD version of the Lenovo Ideapad 5 15 AKA *ARE05, where the *touchscreen* elants_i2c driver wrongly claims the *touchpad* device. For the AMD version AKA *ARE05 we have a working workaround in comment 17, that fixes: 1. the touchpad 2. suspend to RAM (comment 19) The device eventually uses a different touchscreen driver, which was never affected (see comment 19 again). The bug: the elants_i2c driver finds the device by the ACPI id ELAN0001. It then probes the device, to detect if it's actually working. It even fails in there, but instead of giving up on it, it offers a driver interface to flash the "broken" firmware to some working state, and keeps trying to decode messages. Flashing would obviously also fail in this case, as the device is no touchscreen, but a touchpad. So the driver still claims the device and get's really "confused" by all the unknown i2c HID touchpad messages. Maybe the elants_i2c can detect the HID state of the device and then give up?
(In reply to Jan-Marek Glogowski from comment #28) > To all the Intel *IIL05 users: please open a new bug report and handle the > problems with that touchpad / touchscreen in there. It's different HW and > needs completely different fixes. > > Maybe the reporter can update the title of the bug report? > > ---- > > The whole bug was originally about the *touchpad* on the AMD version of the > Lenovo Ideapad 5 15 AKA *ARE05, where the *touchscreen* elants_i2c driver > wrongly claims the *touchpad* device. > > For the AMD version AKA *ARE05 we have a working workaround in comment 17, > that fixes: > 1. the touchpad > 2. suspend to RAM (comment 19) > > The device eventually uses a different touchscreen driver, which was never > affected (see comment 19 again). > > The bug: the elants_i2c driver finds the device by the ACPI id ELAN0001. It > then probes the device, to detect if it's actually working. It even fails in > there, but instead of giving up on it, it offers a driver interface to flash > the "broken" firmware to some working state, and keeps trying to decode > messages. Flashing would obviously also fail in this case, as the device is > no touchscreen, but a touchpad. So the driver still claims the device and > get's really "confused" by all the unknown i2c HID touchpad messages. > > Maybe the elants_i2c can detect the HID state of the device and then give up? New bug report opened: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=209521
Here there is walkaround for AMD Laptop https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1887190
I also experience the problem with the wrong binding of the "ELAN" touchpad device to the compiled-in driver elants_i2c -- https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux-oem-5.6/+bug/1900254 . (In reply to Jan-Marek Glogowski from comment #16) > Currently I'm using this little script, which did work the last few boots: > > echo "i2c-ELAN0001:00" > /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/elants_i2c/unbind > sleep 1.5 > echo "i2c-ELAN0001:00" > /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/i2c_hid/bind As a solution (until the binding of this device is fixed in the linux kernel), I blacklisted this compiled-in driver in the kernel command line, as described in https://unix.stackexchange.com/a/474552/4319 : First, find function names which look like initialization functions of this module: # fgrep elants /boot/System.map-5.8.0-23-generic | fgrep init ffffffff818f3430 t elants_i2c_initialize ffffffff818f40bf t elants_i2c_initialize.cold ffffffff829253f5 t elants_i2c_driver_init ffffffff82af7a30 t __initcall_elants_i2c_driver_init6 # The last one (__initcall*) doesn't look like the one we are looking for. Then add them to the kernel parameters in /etc/default/grub (on Ubuntu) GRUB_CMDLINE_LINUX_DEFAULT="... initcall_blacklist=elants_i2c_initialize initcall_blacklist=elants_i2c_initialize.cold initcall_blacklist=elants_i2c_driver_init" and run update-grub.
Hi All, Thank you for figuring out that the issue is the elants_i2c driver binding to the touchscreen while it should be handled by the i2c-hid driver, that helps a lot. I've written a small patch for the elants_i2c driver to stop it from binding to i2c-hid compatible touchscreens, which should fix this. I'll attach the patch here. I would appreciate it if one of you can build a kernel with this patch (see your distro's docs), remove your workaround and then let me know if this fixes things. If any of you are running Fedora, let me know, then I can provide a pre-built kernel with the patch added. Regards, Hans
Created attachment 295439 [details] [PATCH] Input: elants_i2c - Do not bind to i2c-hid compatible ACPI instantiated devices
I would also appreciate it if some of you can run: sudo apcidump -o acpidump.lenovo-<full-model-name> And then attach the generated acpidump.lenovo-<full-model-name> file here. For example run: sudo apcidump -o acpidump.lenovo-Ideapad-5-15ARE05 And then attach the acpidump.lenovo-Ideapad-5-15ARE05 file here. The reason I'm asking for this is because the fix which I wrote is somewhat simple. It should work, but there might be older touchscreens which actually need to use the Elan specific protocol implemented by elants_i2c.ko; while the ACPI-fwnode describing the touchscreen falsely contains one of the i2c-hid ACPI compatiblity-id strings. This would of course be a bug in the ACPI tables, but I have seen this before. If it turns out this is indeed the case then some more elaborate fix may be necessary and the acpidump(s) may help with figuring that out.
Since 5.12rc1 the touchpad isn't working on my ideapad 5 and I have elants_i2c blacklisted. touchpad is working fine on 5.11
Created attachment 295575 [details] output of sudo apcidump -o acpidump.lenovo-Ideapad-5-15ARE05 Output of the requested command on my ideapad, with the command: sudo apcidump -o acpidump.lenovo-Ideapad-5-15ARE05
@Fibonacci: in 5.12-rc1 there was a big refactoring of i2c-hid. Do you have `CONFIG_I2C_HID_ACPI=m` (or `y`) in you .config file?
Thank you for the acpidump. I'm still waiting on feedback on the patch which I attached here. It would be great if someone can test this and confirm that it fixes things, so that I can submit the fix upstream and we can get this fixed in the mainline kernel.
So the acpidump made me realize that there is an extra check which we can do inside the elants_i2c driver's probe function. We can check for the I2C-HID spec's DSM (device-specific-method) to get the HID descriptor address. If that is not present then the device will not work with the I2C-HID driver. This should reduce the chance of my patch causing regressions for touchscreens which do actually need the elants_i2c driver. I'll attach an updated patch here, please give this new version a try.
Created attachment 295577 [details] [PATCH] Input: elants_i2c - Do not bind to i2c-hid compatible ACPI instantiated devices
Thank you, is it enough if I apply this patch to my distro kernel ? (arch linux, linux 5.11.2)
(In reply to lukasbecker2 from comment #41) > Thank you, is it enough if I apply this patch to my distro kernel ? (arch > linux, linux 5.11.2) Yes, if you can test your distro's 5.11.2 kernel with the patch added on top, that would be great, thank you. p.s. Don't forget to disable any workarounds which you may have put in place when testing the patched kernel.
The touchpad works now as expected with the patch (attatchment 295577), kernel 5.11.2 arch linux (I disabled the privious workaround, kernel param initcall_blacklist=elants_i2c_driver_init).
(In reply to lukasbecker2 from comment #43) > The touchpad works now as expected with the patch (attatchment 295577), > kernel 5.11.2 arch linux (I disabled the privious workaround, kernel param > initcall_blacklist=elants_i2c_driver_init). Great, thank you for testing. I've submitted the patch for this upstream, hopefully it will be merged into 5.12 sometime this cycle and then added to the stable kernel releases after that.
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #44) > (In reply to lukasbecker2 from comment #43) > > The touchpad works now as expected with the patch (attatchment 295577), > > kernel 5.11.2 arch linux (I disabled the privious workaround, kernel param > > initcall_blacklist=elants_i2c_driver_init). > > Great, thank you for testing. I've submitted the patch for this upstream, > hopefully it will be merged into 5.12 sometime this cycle and then added to > the stable kernel releases after that. Thank you for the patch, can you provide a link to the submitted patch so I can check the status form time to time ?
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/YD6VL4CwudwKs5Vo@google.com/T/#t
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #46) > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/YD6VL4CwudwKs5Vo@google.com/T/#t Thank you, :)
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #46) > https://lore.kernel.org/linux-input/YD6VL4CwudwKs5Vo@google.com/T/#t This patch has been merged into 5.13-rc1, so this bug can be closed now.
The patch for this is now also available in the 5.12.6 and 5.10.39 stable kernel releases.
Thank you :)
(In reply to Jan-Marek Glogowski from comment #14) > Thanks for all the info. I saw these error messages and assumed some larger > problem. And didn't register the messages were created by the touchpad > actually, since this is the touchscreen driver. > > And since I managed to brick my HW, I had other things to do > (https://forums.lenovo.com/t5/Lenovo-IdeaPad-1xx-3xx-5xx-7xx-Edge-LaVie-Z- > Flex-Notebooks/Unbricking-Ideapad-5-15ARE05/m-p/5019541), so I could just > test this now. > > Instead of a kernel rebuild, you can simply unbind the device for the > built-in module. Just add some startup script doing: > > modprobe i2c_hid > echo "i2c-ELAN0001:00" > /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/elants_i2c/unbind > echo "i2c-ELAN0001:00" > /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/i2c_hid/bind > > Now I'm wondering, what people with a notebook with an Elan touchscreen > would do... > > The elants_i2c wrongly claims the device. Either a driver bug or a wrong > ACPI DSTD, which in the end the elants_i2c must work around :-( > > And I already had decompiled the ACPI DSTD to have a look... I am on Kubuntu 21.04 and I think my touchpad is ELAN1203 (based on dmesg outputs) and I have the same issue, reported issue here https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213857. I tried to unbind with (using root) echo "i2c-ELAN0001:00" > /sys/bus/i2c/drivers/elants_i2c/unbind But i get the error -bash: echo: write error: No such device Also, I see 2 i2c_hid like modules in lsmod $ lsmod | grep i2c_hid i2c_hid_acpi 16384 0 i2c_hid 28672 1 i2c_hid_acpi hid 135168 3 i2c_hid,usbhid,hid_generic
(In reply to Lovesh from comment #51) > I am on Kubuntu 21.04 and I think my touchpad is ELAN1203 (based on dmesg > outputs) and I have the same issue, reported issue here > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213857. Looking at bug 213857 you are having an issue with the kernel not being able to configure the GPIO pin which is used for the touchpad, which is an entirely different issue. Lets continue discussing this in bug 213857.
(In reply to Hans de Goede from comment #52) > (In reply to Lovesh from comment #51) > > I am on Kubuntu 21.04 and I think my touchpad is ELAN1203 (based on dmesg > > outputs) and I have the same issue, reported issue here > > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=213857. > > Looking at bug 213857 you are having an issue with the kernel not being able > to configure the GPIO pin which is used for the touchpad, which is an > entirely different issue. > > Lets continue discussing this in bug 213857. Sounds good. Thank you.