Subject : BUG: scheduling while atomic Submitter : Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> Date : 2010-08-27 7:59 Message-ID : 20100827075911.GA5966@swordfish.minsk.epam.com References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128289602925505&w=2 This entry is being used for tracking a regression from 2.6.35. Please don't close it until the problem is fixed in the mainline.
> snapshot_ioctl: ioctl '80083307' is deprecated and will be removed \ > soon, update your suspend-to-disk utilities What happens when you use the latest version of s2disk?
On (08/31/10 02:20), bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17331 > > > > snapshot_ioctl: ioctl '80083307' is deprecated and will be removed \ > > soon, update your suspend-to-disk utilities > > What happens when you use the latest version of s2disk? > Hello, I'm running Arch Linux pm-utils 1.4.0-1 (which is the latest stable release according to http://pm-utils.freedesktop.org/wiki/) s2disk -V s2disk (suspend) 0.8 uswsusp 0.8-6 (which is the latest stable release according to http://suspend.sourceforge.net/) Sergey
Created attachment 29252 [details] [debug patch] use the Preemptible to check whether the cond_schedule should be called Hi, Sergey Will you please try the latest linux master tree and see whether the issue still exists? If it exists, will you please try the attached debug patch and see whether it is helpful? Thanks.
On (09/08/10 07:16), bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > Hi, Sergey > Will you please try the latest linux master tree and see whether the > issue > still exists? > > If it exists, will you please try the attached debug patch and see > whether > it is helpful? > > Thanks. Hello, Can't reproduce with 2.6.36-rc4. Seems to be fixed. Sergey
Thanks for confirming that... 2.6.36-rc2-git3 worked 2.6.36-rc2-git4 failed 2.6.36-rc4 works since this doesn't appear in any actual release, i'll assume some other issue in the early rc2 caused it and it is now gone. Please re-open if you see this again.
On (09/14/10 01:29), bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > --- Comment #5 from Len Brown <lenb@kernel.org> 2010-09-14 01:29:43 --- > Thanks for confirming that... > > 2.6.36-rc2-git3 worked > 2.6.36-rc2-git4 failed > 2.6.36-rc4 works > > since this doesn't appear in any actual release, > i'll assume some other issue in the early rc2 caused > it and it is now gone. Please re-open if you see this again. > Sure. Thanks. Sergey