Subject : hackbench regression with kernel 2.6.32-rc1 Submitter : "Zhang, Yanmin" <yanmin_zhang@linux.intel.com> Date : 2009-10-09 9:19 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125508007510274&w=4 Handled-By : Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> This entry is being used for tracking a regression from 2.6.31. Please don't close it until the problem is fixed in the mainline. Caused by: commit 29cd8bae396583a2ee9a3340db8c5102acf9f6fd Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Date: Thu Sep 17 09:01:14 2009 +0200 sched: Fix SD_POWERSAVING_BALANCE|SD_PREFER_LOCAL vs SD_WAKE_AFFINE and commit de69a80be32445b0a71e8e3b757e584d7beb90f7 Author: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl> Date: Thu Sep 17 09:01:20 2009 +0200 sched: Stop buddies from hogging the system
First-Bad-Commit : 29cd8bae396583a2ee9a3340db8c5102acf9f6fd
On core2 arch machines, hackbench regression disappears and there is much improvement instead of regression. On Nehalem machine, no big change, comparing with 2.6.31. On Itanium machines (2 sockets or 4 sockets), the regression become about 20%. Originally it's 70%. I think we could close the bug report now. I might continue to investigate the regression on Itanium machine.
Closing.