Subject : [BISECTED] "conservative" cpufreq governor broken
Submitter : Steven Noonan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date : 2009-10-05 16:32
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=125476067108252&w=4
This entry is being used for tracking a regression from 2.6.30. Please don't
close it until the problem is fixed in the mainline.
Author: Eero Nurkkala <email@example.com>
Date: Mon May 25 09:57:37 2009 +0300
NOHZ: Properly feed cpufreq ondemand governor
Signed-off-by: Eero Nurkkala <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Reported-by: Tero Kristo <email@example.com>
Acked-by: Rik van Riel <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Acked-by: Venkatesh Pallipadi <email@example.com>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <firstname.lastname@example.org>
First-Bad-Commit : f2e21c9610991e95621a81407cdbab881226419b
On Monday 12 October 2009, Steven Noonan wrote:
> Hi Rafael,
> There's a commit to fix this in the stable queue for 2.6.31.x and said
> fix is already in the 2.6.32 tree. The commit is titled "NOHZ: update
> idle state also when NOHZ is inactive" (fdc6f192e7).
> - Steven
> On Sun, Oct 11, 2009 at 4:01 PM, Rafael J. Wysocki <email@example.com> wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31.
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.30 and 2.6.31. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14377
> > Subject : "conservative" cpufreq governor broken
> > Submitter : Steven Noonan <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > Date : 2009-10-05 16:32 (7 days old)