Bug 13648 - nfsd: page allocation failure
nfsd: page allocation failure
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE
Product: Networking
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Other
All Linux
: P1 normal
Assigned To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
:
Depends on:
Blocks: 11808
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2009-06-28 21:36 UTC by Rafael J. Wysocki
Modified: 2012-11-20 16:46 UTC (History)
4 users (show)

See Also:
Kernel Version: 2.6.33
Tree: Mainline
Regression: Yes


Attachments

Description Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-06-28 21:36:15 UTC
Subject    : 2.6.30: nfsd: page allocation failure - nfsd or kernel problem? (again with 2.6.30
Submitter  : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Date       : 2009-06-22 12:08
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309

This entry is being used for tracking a regression from 2.6.29.  Please don't
close it until the problem is fixed in the mainline.
Comment 1 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-07-26 21:33:48 UTC
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124748600712853&w=4
Notify-Also : Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com>
Notify-Also : David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Notify-Also : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
Comment 2 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-07-27 22:01:52 UTC
On Monday 27 July 2009, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:45:33 +0200 (CEST)
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
> 
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.  Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648
> > Subject		: nfsd: page allocation failure
> > Submitter	: Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
> > Date		: 2009-06-22 12:08 (35 days old)
> > References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309
> > 		  http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124748600712853&w=4
> > 
> 
> This is no regression between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30.
> In fact we could reproduce the problem with kernel versions:
> 
> 2.6.27.26 < X <= 2.6.30.3
> 
> (Meaning 2.6.27.26 is the last one _not_ showing the problem).
Comment 3 Rafael J. Wysocki 2009-07-27 22:03:24 UTC
Moving to the list of regressions from 2.6.27.
Comment 4 Orion Poplawski 2009-08-24 19:24:16 UTC
I see a lot of these with 2.6.30.5-28.rc2.fc11.i686.PAE and e1000.
Comment 5 Florian Mickler 2010-09-03 09:36:00 UTC
Did this issue get resolved somehow? 

There is some discussion about shutting the warning off, but I couldn't quite follow.... ( http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/30960/ )
Comment 6 Orion Poplawski 2010-09-03 14:24:24 UTC
I'm still seeing with 2.6.33.8-149.fc13.i686.
Comment 7 Florian Mickler 2010-11-11 19:23:56 UTC
Ok, thanks for the feedback.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.