Subject : 2.6.30: nfsd: page allocation failure - nfsd or kernel problem? (again with 2.6.30 Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> Date : 2009-06-22 12:08 References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309 This entry is being used for tracking a regression from 2.6.29. Please don't close it until the problem is fixed in the mainline.
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124748600712853&w=4 Notify-Also : Stephan von Krawczynski <skraw@ithnet.com> Notify-Also : David Rientjes <rientjes@google.com> Notify-Also : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com>
On Monday 27 July 2009, Stephan von Krawczynski wrote: > On Sun, 26 Jul 2009 22:45:33 +0200 (CEST) > "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13648 > > Subject : nfsd: page allocation failure > > Submitter : Justin Piszcz <jpiszcz@lucidpixels.com> > > Date : 2009-06-22 12:08 (35 days old) > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/22/309 > > http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124748600712853&w=4 > > > > This is no regression between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > In fact we could reproduce the problem with kernel versions: > > 2.6.27.26 < X <= 2.6.30.3 > > (Meaning 2.6.27.26 is the last one _not_ showing the problem).
Moving to the list of regressions from 2.6.27.
I see a lot of these with 2.6.30.5-28.rc2.fc11.i686.PAE and e1000.
Did this issue get resolved somehow? There is some discussion about shutting the warning off, but I couldn't quite follow.... ( http://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/30960/ )
I'm still seeing with 2.6.33.8-149.fc13.i686.
Ok, thanks for the feedback.