Subject : [BUG]cpufreq_ondemand: a recent regression Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> Date : 2009-05-31 16:36 References : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca> This entry is being used for tracking a regression from 2.6.29. Please don't close it until the problem is fixed in the mainline.
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/28/405
On Monday 27 July 2009, Mathieu Desnoyers wrote: > It should be fixed now by recents commits to the cpufreq tree, which got > into mainline: > > 42a06f2166f2f6f7bf04f32b4e823eacdceafdc9 > b253d2b2d28ead6fed012feb54694b3d0562839a > b14893a62c73af0eca414cfed505b8c09efc613c > 7d26e2d5e2da37e92c6c7644b26b294dedd8c982 > 37c90e8887efd218dc4af949b7f498ca2da4af9f > 5a75c82828e7c088ca6e7b4827911dc29cc8e774 > ee88415caf736b89500f16e0a545614541a45005 > 3f4a782b5ce2698b1870b5a7b573cd721d4fce33 > 5e1596f75395e7a402e1059c518e633d2732dcf8 > > Mathieu > > > * Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw@sisk.pl) wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.29 and 2.6.30. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let me know (either way). > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13424 > > Subject : possible deadlock when doing governor switching > > Submitter : Shaohua Li <shaohua.li@intel.com> > > Date : 2009-05-31 16:36 (57 days old) > > References : http://www.spinics.net/lists/cpufreq/msg00711.html > > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/6/28/405 > > Handled-By : Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@polymtl.ca>