Subject : s2disk hangs with kernel >=2.6.29, SATA, Gigabyte EG45M-DS2H (bisected)
Submitter : Richard Atterer <email@example.com>
Date : 2009-05-16 22:51
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124251446428166&w=4
Handled-By : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Author: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <email@example.com>
Date: Fri Jan 2 16:12:48 2009 +0100
ide: don't execute the next queued command from the hard-IRQ context (v2)
First-Bad-Commit : 295f00042aaf6b553b5f37348f89bab463d4a469
This entry is being used for tracking a regression from 2.6.28. Please don't
close it until the problem is fixed in the mainline.
Please move this out from IDE:
It turned out later that issue also happens with *CONFIG_IDE=n* (the problem was bisected to commit 295f00042aaf6b553b5f37348f89bab463d4a469 which was quite soon fixed by commit 2ea5521022ac8f4f528dcbae02668e02a3501a5a).
I was working with Richard on bisecting it further during past week but since we are hitting a whole ton of unrelated kernel problems it takes a lot of time...
First-Bad-Commit : Unknown
Not-Handled-By : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Notify-Also : Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <email@example.com>
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/25/253
On Sunday 31 May 2009, Richard Atterer wrote:
> This bug is still present.
> On Sat, May 30, 2009 at 09:55:39PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13371
> > Subject : s2disk hangs with kernel 2.6.29 and later, SATA,
> Gigabyte EG45M-DS2H
> Better: s2disk hangs with e100, kernel 2.6.29 and later
> > Submitter : Richard Atterer <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > Date : 2009-05-16 22:51 (15 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=124251446428166&w=4
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2009/5/25/253
> Latest information: The e100 driver is responsible for the problem.
Handled-By : Jeffrey Kirsher <email@example.com>
Not-Handled-By : Rafael J. Wysocki <firstname.lastname@example.org>
On Sunday 07 June 2009, you wrote:
> On Sun, Jun 07, 2009 at 12:06:23PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > introduced between 2.6.28 and 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should
> > be listed and let me know (either way).
> Well, nobody has approached me with a patch to try out, so I think it's
> still there. I've worked around the problem by blacklisting e100 to get it
> rmmod'ed before the suspend.
*** Bug 13353 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 13353 ***