Subject : regression in 2.6.29-git3 on SH/Dreamcast Submitter : Adrian McMenamin <adrian@newgolddream.dyndns.info> Date : 2009-03-29 19:04 References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123835353115372&w=4 Notify-Also : Manuel Lauss <mano@roarinelk.homelinux.net> This entry is being used for tracking a regression from 2.6.29. Please don't close it until the problem is fixed in the mainline.
On Sunday 17 May 2009, Pekka Enberg wrote: > On Thu, 2009-04-16 at 23:45 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > >> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > >> of recent regressions. > >> > >> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > >> from 2.6.29. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know > >> (either way). > >> > >> > >> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13069 > >> Subject : regression in 2.6.29-git3 on SH/Dreamcast > >> Submitter : Adrian McMenamin <adrian@newgolddream.dyndns.info> > >> Date : 2009-03-29 19:04 (19 days old) > >> References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=123835353115372&w=4 > > On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 8:37 PM, Adrian McMenamin > <adrian@newgolddream.info> wrote: > > At this point it *looks* as though it was simply a question of > > insufficient memory to boot, but I think it needs further testing. > > Nobody else seems to have picked it up though. > > Yeah, it looks like there's not enough memory to boot. It could well > be that the kernel memory footprint got bigger but I don't think the > bisected commit is at fault here. Perhaps we should just close the > bug?
Closing it is fine with me, thanks for looking at this.