Subject : Problem with kernel commit 664d080c41463570b95717b5ad86e79dc1be0877
Submitter : "Michal 'vorner' Vaner" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Date : 2008-09-21 17:35
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-acpi&m=122201853409501&w=4
This entry is being used for tracking a regression from 2.6.26. Please don't
close it until the problem is fixed in the mainline.
Reportedly caused by:
Author: Holger Macht <email@example.com>
Date: Tue Jun 3 20:27:59 2008 +0200
[libata] ACPI: Properly handle bay devices in dock stations
Signed-off-by: Holger Macht <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <email@example.com>
Not a regression from 2.6.26.
Do you mean that commit 664d080c41463570b95717b5ad86e79dc1be0877 was present in 2.6.26?
Shaohua has a patch set which fixed a lot of dock issue.
please give them a try. :)
note that there are 11 patches in all.
BTW: seems like a duplicate of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=451399
I got a all-in-one patch by mail from Holger Macht (the author of the changes is Shaohua), so it should be the same patchset.
It fixes the issue, removing and inserting of the device work and the interrupts disappeared.
Should I test these patches too, or is this OK?
(In reply to comment #5)
> I got a all-in-one patch by mail from Holger Macht (the author of the changes
> is Shaohua), so it should be the same patchset.
> It fixes the issue, removing and inserting of the device work and the
> interrupts disappeared.
> Should I test these patches too, or is this OK?
then, you don't need to test these patches. :)
Mark this bug as PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE.
cc Shaohua and Holger.
this patch series is in the acpi-test tree, and thus linux next,
staged for 2.6.28-rc1
shipped in linux-2.6.28-rc1