Bug 11201 - kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_64.c:357!
kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_64.c:357!
Status: CLOSED CODE_FIX
Product: Platform Specific/Hardware
Classification: Unclassified
Component: x86-64
All Linux
: P1 normal
Assigned To: platform_x86_64@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
:
Depends on:
Blocks: Regressions-2.6.26
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-07-31 13:57 UTC by Rafael J. Wysocki
Modified: 2008-08-12 11:05 UTC (History)
5 users (show)

See Also:
Kernel Version: 2.6.27-rc1
Tree: Mainline
Regression: Yes


Attachments

Description Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-07-31 13:57:03 UTC
Subject    : kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_64.c:357!
Submitter  : Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date       : 2008-07-29 16:21
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121734804508255&w=4
Handled-By : "Yinghai Lu" <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
Handled-By : "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Patch      : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121735924628623&w=4

This entry is being used for tracking a regression from 2.6.26.  Please don't
close it until the problem is fixed in the mainline.
Comment 1 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-08-03 05:17:05 UTC
On Sunday, 3 of August 2008, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
> 
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed
> > and let me know (either way).
> 
> Yes it should still be listed.
> 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11201
> > Subject		: kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_64.c:357!
> > Submitter	: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Date		: 2008-07-29 16:21 (5 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121734804508255&w=4
> > Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
> > 		  Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> > Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121735924628623&w=4

Comment 2 Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-08-10 05:40:28 UTC
On Sunday, 10 of August 2008, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
> 
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.26.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> 
> Yep.  There is a patch in -mm.  It seems the process is to wait for Thomas &
> Ingo to get back before we send this to Linus. 
> 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=11201
> > Subject		: kernel BUG at arch/x86/kernel/io_apic_64.c:357!
> > Submitter	: Dhaval Giani <dhaval@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> > Date		: 2008-07-29 16:21 (12 days old)
> > References	: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121734804508255&w=4
> > Handled-By	: Yinghai Lu <yhlu.kernel@gmail.com>
> > 		  Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
> > Patch		: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121735924628623&w=4

Comment 3 Adrian Bunk 2008-08-12 11:05:33 UTC
fixed by commit 3c7569b284e1be55d086b61a70d9f545326f6d74

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.