Bug 10827 - 2.6.26rc4 GFS2 oops.
2.6.26rc4 GFS2 oops.
Status: CLOSED CODE_FIX
Product: File System
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Other
All Linux
: P1 normal
Assigned To: fs_other
:
Depends on:
Blocks: 10492
  Show dependency treegraph
 
Reported: 2008-05-29 14:56 UTC by Rafael J. Wysocki
Modified: 2008-06-25 01:31 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Kernel Version: 2.6.26-rc4
Tree: Mainline
Regression: Yes


Attachments

Description Rafael J. Wysocki 2008-05-29 14:56:41 UTC
Subject    : 2.6.26rc4 GFS2 oops.
Submitter  : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
Date       : 2008-05-27 15:44
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/27/297

This entry is being used for tracking a regression from 2.6.25.  Please don't
close it until the problem is fixed in the mainline.
Comment 1 Adrian Bunk 2008-06-22 02:10:59 UTC
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:12:03PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
> 
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
> 
> 
> Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10827
> Subject		: 2.6.26rc4 GFS2 oops.
> Submitter	: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
> Date		: 2008-05-27 15:44 (19 days old)
> References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/27/297

Dave, what is the status of this bug?

It's currently listed as a 2.6.26-rc regression.

Is it actually confirmed that 2.6.25 is fine?

According to the thread of the bug report there should now be a bug 
report in the Red Hat Bugzilla for it. Bug number?

Thanks
Adrian

Comment 2 Anonymous Emailer 2008-06-23 07:43:47 UTC
Reply-To: rpeterso@redhat.com

On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 12:09 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:12:03PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> > 
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
> > 
> > 
> > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10827
> > Subject		: 2.6.26rc4 GFS2 oops.
> > Submitter	: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
> > Date		: 2008-05-27 15:44 (19 days old)
> > References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/27/297
> 
> Dave, what is the status of this bug?
> 
> It's currently listed as a 2.6.26-rc regression.
> 
> Is it actually confirmed that 2.6.25 is fine?
> 
> According to the thread of the bug report there should now be a bug 
> report in the Red Hat Bugzilla for it. Bug number?
> 
> Thanks
> Adrian

Hi,

This appears to be a known bug.  There's a Fedora bugzilla record for
it here, which contains a patch to fix the problem:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448866

The bug does not appear to be in 2.6.25; 2.6.25 is fine afaict.

Regards,

Bob Peterson
Red Hat GFS


Comment 3 Adrian Bunk 2008-06-23 08:15:42 UTC
Handled-By      : Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com>
Patch           : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309757
 
Comment 4 Adrian Bunk 2008-06-23 08:16:47 UTC
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 09:40:39AM -0500, Bob Peterson wrote:
> On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 12:09 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:12:03PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > > 
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.25.  Please verify if it still should be listed.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Bug-Entry	: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10827
> > > Subject		: 2.6.26rc4 GFS2 oops.
> > > Submitter	: Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
> > > Date		: 2008-05-27 15:44 (19 days old)
> > > References	: http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/27/297
> > 
> > Dave, what is the status of this bug?
> > 
> > It's currently listed as a 2.6.26-rc regression.
> > 
> > Is it actually confirmed that 2.6.25 is fine?
> > 
> > According to the thread of the bug report there should now be a bug 
> > report in the Red Hat Bugzilla for it. Bug number?
> > 
> > Thanks
> > Adrian
> 
> Hi,
> 
> This appears to be a known bug.  There's a Fedora bugzilla record for
> it here, which contains a patch to fix the problem:
> 
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448866

Thanks for the pointer.

> The bug does not appear to be in 2.6.25; 2.6.25 is fine afaict.

Yup, the patch in your Bugzilla is for code that is new in 2.6.26.

Can you push your patch for inclusion into 2.6.26 so that 2.6.26 won't 
get released with this regression?

> Regards,
> 
> Bob Peterson
> Red Hat GFS

Thanks
Adrian

Comment 5 Anonymous Emailer 2008-06-23 08:35:17 UTC
Reply-To: rpeterso@redhat.com

> Yup, the patch in your Bugzilla is for code that is new in 2.6.26.
> 
> Can you push your patch for inclusion into 2.6.26 so that 2.6.26 won't 
> get released with this regression?
> 
> Thanks
> Adrian

Hi Adrian,

Unfortunately, I cannot.  All access to the gfs2 "-nmw" git tree is
controlled by Steve Whitehouse, and he is on vacation/holiday until
tomorrow.

I've submitted the patch to cluster-devel, so hopefully he'll push it
as soon as he returns tomorrow.

Regards,

Bob Peterson
Red Hat GFS


Comment 6 Adrian Bunk 2008-06-25 01:31:46 UTC
fixed by commit 17c15da00c0e7289375ad57e8fea0c7892b74aa0

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.