Bug 8328
Summary: | Epson Perfection 1260 scanner not working with 2.6.17 and 2.6.18 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Drivers | Reporter: | Pallinger P (pallinger) |
Component: | USB | Assignee: | Greg Kroah-Hartman (greg) |
Status: | REJECTED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | ||
Priority: | P2 | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Kernel Version: | 2.6.17 | Subsystem: | |
Regression: | --- | Bisected commit-id: | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 5089 |
Description
Pallinger P
2007-04-15 04:36:01 UTC
Reply-To: akpm@linux-foundation.org On Sun, 15 Apr 2007 04:36:07 -0700 bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8328 > > Summary: Epson Perfection 1260 scanner not working with 2.6.17 > and 2.6.18 > Kernel Version: 2.6.17 > Status: NEW > Severity: normal > Owner: greg@kroah.com > Submitter: pallinger@fastmail.fm > > > Most recent kernel where this bug did *NOT* occur: 2.4.31 > Distribution: Debian 4.0 "Etch" > Hardware Environment: > First: > AMD XP 2400+ CPU > VIA KT600 chipset > Epson Perfection 1260 scanner > Second: > Intel pentium M CPU > Intel 82801 chipset > Epson Perfection 1260 scanner > Software Environment: > udev 0.105-4 > xsane 0.99+0.991-2 > libsane 1.0.18-5 > Problem Description: > xsane does not recognise scanner > It seems as if no class drivers would claim the scanner. The documentation > hinted that the "usbhid" module should handle scanners, but apparently, it does > not handle this one (I tried to load it by hand). The "scanner" module in 2.4.31 > does claim this device, and scanning works fine with xsane. > The bug was reproduced using on two different computers (but the same > scanner), and both on 2.6.18 and 1.6.17 kernels. > > Steps to reproduce: > - Plug in epson perfection 1260 scanner > - run xsane Reply-To: oliver@neukum.org Am Sonntag, 15. April 2007 19:04 schrieb Andrew Morton: > > Problem Description: > > > The scanner module was removed and scanners except for old Microtek
> scanners are now handled via libusb. This is a problem caused by an
> outdated configuration of SANE, not a kernel regression.
>
> Regards
> Oliver
I am glad to hear that.
I know that this isn't the forum to do so, but could you please tell me a way to
solve this problem (or send a link containing the solution)?
Many thanks
PP
You can probably start with http://www.freecolormanagement.com/sane/libusb.html And it is now time to close this bug I guess. Thanks |