Bug 707

Summary: Compilation error of Initio9100 SCSI
Product: SCSI Drivers Reporter: Andrzej Zawadzki (zawadaa)
Component: OtherAssignee: Mike Anderson (andmike)
Status: REJECTED DUPLICATE    
Severity: normal    
Priority: P2    
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Kernel Version: 2.5.69 Subsystem:
Regression: --- Bisected commit-id:

Description Andrzej Zawadzki 2003-05-12 02:59:23 UTC
Distribution: PLD Linux Distribution
Hardware Environment:Mainboard Abit on VIA266
Software Environment: gcc version 3.2.3 (PLD Linux); glibc-2.3.2-2
Problem Description: Compilation error

LOG:

make -f scripts/Makefile.build obj=drivers/scsi
  gcc -Wp,-MD,drivers/scsi/.ini9100u.o.d -D__KERNEL__ -Iinclude -Wall
-Wstrict-prototypes -Wno-trigraphs -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -fno-common -pipe
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 -march=athlon -Iinclude/asm-i386/mach-default
-fomit-frame-pointer -nostdinc -iwithprefix include -DMODULE  
-DKBUILD_BASENAME=ini9100u -DKBUILD_MODNAME=initio -c -o drivers/scsi/ini9100u.o
drivers/scsi/ini9100u.c
drivers/scsi/ini9100u.c:111:2: #error Please convert me to
Documentation/DMA-mapping.txt
drivers/scsi/ini9100u.c:144: unknown field `next' specified in initializer
drivers/scsi/ini9100u.c:144: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
drivers/scsi/ini9100u.c:144: warning: initialization from incompatible pointer type
drivers/scsi/ini9100u.c: In function `i91uAppendSRBToQueue':
drivers/scsi/ini9100u.c:226: structure has no member named `next'
drivers/scsi/ini9100u.c:231: structure has no member named `next'
drivers/scsi/ini9100u.c: In function `i91uPopSRBFromQueue':
drivers/scsi/ini9100u.c:253: structure has no member named `next'
drivers/scsi/ini9100u.c:254: structure has no member named `next'
drivers/scsi/ini9100u.c: In function `i91uBuildSCB':
drivers/scsi/ini9100u.c:492: structure has no member named `address'
drivers/scsi/ini9100u.c:501: structure has no member named `address'
make[2]: *** [drivers/scsi/ini9100u.o] Error 1
make[1]: *** [drivers/scsi] Error 2
make: *** [drivers] Error 2



Steps to reproduce:
Comment 1 Dave Jones 2003-05-12 04:36:07 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 213 ***