Bug 6329
Summary: | OOPS in snd_pcm_oss | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Drivers | Reporter: | Konrad Rzepecki (hannibal) |
Component: | Sound(ALSA) | Assignee: | Jaroslav Kysela (perex) |
Status: | CLOSED CODE_FIX | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | akpm, tiwai |
Priority: | P2 | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Kernel Version: | 2.6.17-rc1 | Subsystem: | |
Regression: | --- | Bisected commit-id: | |
Attachments: |
OOPS from syslog
config OOPS from syslog - without NVIDIA Other oops in snd_pcm_oss Fix PCM OSS bug for 2.6.17rc1 Better fix for PCM-OSS Oops on 2.6.17rc1 |
Description
Konrad Rzepecki
2006-04-04 08:13:17 UTC
Created attachment 7759 [details]
OOPS from syslog
Created attachment 7760 [details]
config
This is repeatable, yes? Could you please check that it happens in a kernel which hasn't been tainted by the nvidia driver? Did earlier kernels have this problem? 2.6.16? Yes, it is repeatable. 2.6.16 works OK. Nvidia module absence has no influence to it. I discovered that filles during crash on this oops returns (translations): Audio write: Deskryptor pliku w złym stanie (File descriptor in bad shape) Naruszenie ochrony pamięci (Segmentation fault) Created attachment 7763 [details]
OOPS from syslog - without NVIDIA
Created attachment 7777 [details]
Other oops in snd_pcm_oss
I found out that other oss-using apps also can cause oopses (flash plugin). It
occurs on closing browser using flash plugin to play some sounds or music.
Created attachment 7778 [details]
Fix PCM OSS bug for 2.6.17rc1
Could you try the patch above? It works OK. Both type of OOPS-es didn't occur again. Thanks for the patch. Created attachment 7779 [details]
Better fix for PCM-OSS Oops on 2.6.17rc1
The second patch also works. The "Better fix for PCM-OSS Oops on 2.6.17rc1" patch fixed my Ooops reported here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=114479997800001&r=1&w=2 I'm closing this bug, because in 2.6.17 it no longer exists. Patch was applied long time ago (AFAIR before 2.6.17-rc2) into mainline. BTW. What is the bug closing policy? I think, that bug owner should closing it (or subsystem mantainer). Submiter not always have enough knowlege about problem (this including myself ;-), and shouldn't do it. But also bug cannot be "new" forever, especially when it is in fact resolved... |