Bug 5740
Summary: | tsc ocassionally counts back with dual core | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Timers | Reporter: | Adrian Yee (brewt-bugzilla.kernel.org) |
Component: | Interval Timers | Assignee: | john stultz (john.stultz) |
Status: | REJECTED UNREPRODUCIBLE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | john.stultz |
Priority: | P2 | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Kernel Version: | 2.6.15-rc5 | Subsystem: | |
Regression: | --- | Bisected commit-id: | |
Attachments: |
dmesg (smp, apic, acpi, pmtmr)
config for 2.6.15-rc5 |
Description
Adrian Yee
2005-12-14 00:47:00 UTC
Created attachment 6818 [details]
dmesg (smp, apic, acpi, pmtmr)
Created attachment 6819 [details]
config for 2.6.15-rc5
I forgot to add that I was having similar issues with an Abit AV8 (VIA K8T800 Pro chipset) motherboard with the Athlon 64 X2 3800+ as well, but using a different kernel configuration. Assuming CONFIG_X86_PM_TIMER is enabled, the ACPI PM timer should be used and timekeeping problems related to unsycned TSCs should go away. The main concern in this bug is the sluggishness reported when the ACPI PM timer is used. I'm not sure what the cause of this would be, and the bug filer has not been able to recreate the issue in a reliable way. I'm going to leave this open in hopes someone else might recognize a similar problem or further info appears. Adrian: Are you still experiencing sluggishness w/ 2.6.16-rc2 usign the pmtmr? Is there any way you could better describe the sluggishness? Maybe could you run "time make -j3 bzImage" three times and submit the results here? I'm not sure if I've gotten more used to it, or what, but I haven't really felt the system being sluggish since then. The reason why I filed the bug was mainly because of the TSC issue. Even though I'm using the pmtmr, isn't the TSC counting backwards still an issue (I'm not completely sure how things work, but isn't it possible that things still use the TSC as a timing source?). This bug is a bit stale. Adrian: Does the sluggishness you described in this bug still exist w/ 2.6.18-rc4? Thanks for the feedback, if its not being seen, then I'm going to go ahead and close this. |