Bug 5483
Summary: | 2.6.13.x crashes with enabled acpi-cpufreq | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | ACPI | Reporter: | Boris Nicolaev (aein) |
Component: | Power-Processor | Assignee: | Venkatesh Pallipadi (venki) |
Status: | CLOSED CODE_FIX | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | acpi-bugzilla, redboots |
Priority: | P2 | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Kernel Version: | 2.6.13.x | Subsystem: | |
Regression: | --- | Bisected commit-id: | |
Attachments: |
acpidump output
DSDT dmesg output of 2.6.12.6 kernel dmesg output of 2.6.14-rc5 kernel DSDT _PDC call sequence change. dmesg output of patched 2.6.13.4 kernel dmesg output of patched 2.6.14-rc5 kernel Cleaner ACPI _PDC cleanup patch dmesg of 2.6.14-rc5 kernel with applied cleaner PDC patch refreshed patch against 2.6.15-rc3 acpi tree 5483 earlier patch had an issue with IPF. Incremental patch to fix it. acpidump output brice's dmesg |
Description
Boris Nicolaev
2005-10-22 13:16:50 UTC
Created attachment 6359 [details]
acpidump output
No differences in 2.6.12.6 and 2.6.14-5
Created attachment 6360 [details]
DSDT
No differences in 2.6.12.6 and 2.6.14-5
Created attachment 6361 [details]
dmesg output of 2.6.12.6 kernel
Created attachment 6362 [details]
dmesg output of 2.6.14-rc5 kernel
Created attachment 6363 [details]
DSDT
No differences in 2.6.12.6 and 2.6.14-rc5
Created attachment 6364 [details]
_PDC call sequence change.
This patch should help. Let me know how it goes with this patch. If this works
I will send out a cleaner version of this to base later.
This patch normalizes 2.6.13.4 and remove error message from 2.6.14-rc5. Thank you very much -- it's work ! In attachments dmesg from patched 2.6.13.4 and 2.6.14-rc5. Created attachment 6365 [details]
dmesg output of patched 2.6.13.4 kernel
Created attachment 6366 [details]
dmesg output of patched 2.6.14-rc5 kernel
Thats great! I will attach a cleaner patch in a day or two. Created attachment 6367 [details]
Cleaner ACPI _PDC cleanup patch
Attached is a cleaner (and bigger) patch. Minimally tested at this point and
needs more testing before going to the base. Please check whether this still
fixes the issue here.
I try cleaner ACPI PDC patch with 2.6.14-rc5 kernel and it's working normally. I can't try it with 2.6.13.4 kernel because file 'linux-2.6.13/arch/ia64/kernel/cpufreq/acpi-cpufreq.c' doesn't exist. Later I can test this patch without patching unexisting files. Created attachment 6377 [details]
dmesg of 2.6.14-rc5 kernel with applied cleaner PDC patch
Thanks. Just testing it against 2.6.14-rc5 should be enough. I don't think you need to retest it with 2.6.13. This patch will need some more testing and I expect it to go in 2.6.15 timeframe. So, you may still see failures with 2.6.14 release :(. *** Bug 4454 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Cleaner PDC patch seems to be not included in 2.6.15-rc1 2.6.15-rc1 works without patch same as 2.6.14, with patch -- all ok. Created attachment 6731 [details] refreshed patch against 2.6.15-rc3 acpi tree refreshed patch from comment 11 applied to acpi-test tree Before this patch an SE7525GP2 (dual 3.6GHz Xeon) running the latest BIOS (SE7525GP20.86B.P.09.00.0039.092120051351) was unable to load acpi-cpufreq. After this patch it works normally -- yipee! Created attachment 6745 [details]
5483 earlier patch had an issue with IPF. Incremental patch to fix it.
patch in comment #19 applied to acpi-test tree Created attachment 6968 [details]
acpidump output
This patch causes acpi-cpufreq to ENODEV on Brice Goglin's machine.
Created attachment 6969 [details]
brice's dmesg
Brice's dmesg doesn't contains messages, related acpi-cpufreq to ENODEV issue. Brice's issue was that the preferred native driver, speedstep-centrino, was missing from the configuration. we need to merge these two drivers to make it impossible to mis-configure. Shipped in 2.6.16-rc1-git6 -- closing. |