Bug 53291
Summary: | Annoying e1000e link up and down issue | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Drivers | Reporter: | Dan (dan76) |
Component: | Network | Assignee: | drivers_network (drivers_network) |
Status: | RESOLVED INVALID | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | alan |
Priority: | P1 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Kernel Version: | 3.7.0 | Subsystem: | |
Regression: | No | Bisected commit-id: |
Description
Dan
2013-01-31 16:42:46 UTC
I forgot to mention I had to disable autonegotiation so it can stay stable at 10 Mbps. Output from ethtool: Supported ports: [ TP ] Supported link modes: 10baseT/Half 10baseT/Full 100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full 1000baseT/Full Supports auto-negotiation: Yes Advertised link modes: Not reported Advertised auto-negotiation: No Speed: 10Mb/s Duplex: Full Port: Twisted Pair PHYAD: 2 Transceiver: internal Auto-negotiation: off Supports Wake-on: pumbg Wake-on: g Current message level: 0x00000007 (7) Link detected: yes Forget it. I separate the cable from the others and now it's ok. Probably cable interference. thanks. I reopened this because I was wrong and the problem remains. Anyone wants to comment or give a hint? Thanks. Well, my workaround is to turn off (unplug from AC power) the TP-Link WDR4300, wait a few minutes and turn it on. Then e1000e will autonegotiate 1000 Mbps correctly. The question is: the problem is with the router or with the e1000e driver? Since many users are having the same problem, couldn't e1000e deal with it ia a better way? Nobody? This is a bug tracking system not a support forum. I would ask netdev@vger.kernel.org or the drvier maintainers at Intel. (In reply to Alan from comment #6) > This is a bug tracking system not a support forum. I would ask > netdev@vger.kernel.org or the drvier maintainers at Intel. I am not asking for support. I thought it could be a bug. I asked in the e1000e list and the developer said Intel complies with the standard so it's a problem with the router. Anyway, it doesn't happen with Realtek, so better to buy motherboard with realtek chip instead of intel if someone wish to use with a TP-Link router. Anyway I'll mark it as INVALID. Thanks. Ok cool - I wasn't sure if it had just been sitting there - and the "Nobody ?" question made me concerned. Alan (In reply to Alan from comment #8) > Ok cool - I wasn't sure if it had just been sitting there - and the "Nobody > ?" question made me concerned. > > Alan No problem. Thanks for the feedback. |