Bug 4569
Summary: | setitimer timer expires too early | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Timers | Reporter: | Olivier Croquette (olivier) |
Component: | Other | Assignee: | john stultz (john.stultz) |
Status: | CLOSED PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | george, nacc |
Priority: | P2 | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Kernel Version: | 2.4.20, 2.6.11.7 | Subsystem: | |
Regression: | No | Bisected commit-id: | |
Attachments: |
See LKML discussion also
Results for kernel 2.4 and 2.6 Program to test |
Description
Olivier Croquette
2005-05-01 13:06:09 UTC
Created attachment 5003 [details]
See LKML discussion also
-
Created attachment 5004 [details]
Results for kernel 2.4 and 2.6
Created attachment 5005 [details]
Program to test
Hey George, I know you were workign on something similar recently. Is this the same bug? > ------- Additional Comments From johnstul@us.ibm.com 2005-08-08 11:28 > ------- > Hey George, I know you were workign on something similar recently. Is this > the > same bug? I don't think so. There was a recent problem with timers expiring too late, especially periodic where a +1 was NOT needed (we know where we are WRT jiffy in this case). But I am not aware of a real problem with too early. I will take a look at the test program here and let you know. > This is fixed in 2.6.12, however, incorrectly. There is a patch in Linus' tree to fix it correctly. If I had the power, I would mark as "PATCH_ALREADY_AVAILABLE" and close. Thanks George! ocroquette: Could you confirm this is fixed in 2.6.13-rc6? If so I'll close this. |