Bug 38292

Summary: slab vs lockdep vs debugobjects
Product: Memory Management Reporter: Maciej Rutecki (maciej.rutecki)
Component: Slab AllocatorAssignee: Pekka Enberg (penberg)
Status: RESOLVED OBSOLETE    
Severity: normal CC: alan, maciej.rutecki, rjw
Priority: P1    
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Kernel Version: 3.0-rc3 Subsystem:
Regression: No Bisected commit-id:

Description Maciej Rutecki 2011-06-26 20:03:22 UTC 
Subject    : slab vs lockdep vs debugobjects
Submitter  : Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Date       : 2011-06-20 17:48
Message-ID : 1308592080.26237.114.camel@twins
References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=130859214215636&w=2

This entry is being used for tracking a regression from 2.6.39. Please don't
close it until the problem is fixed in the mainline.
Comment 1 Rafael J. Wysocki 2011-06-26 22:40:20 UTC 
On Monday, June 27, 2011, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> 
> * Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org> wrote:
> 
> > On Sun, 2011-06-26 at 23:23 +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a summary
> report
> > > of recent regressions.
> > > 
> > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > > from 2.6.39.  Please verify if it still should be listed and let the
> tracking team
> > > know (either way).
> > 
> > who said its a regression?
> 
> I suspect Rafael saw your mail to lkml with a nasty looking lockdep 
> message in it and assumed it was a new one?
> 
> Instead it's one that always had the chance to trigger?