Bug 35852
Summary: | SO_PRIORITY does not set TOS field in IP header | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Documentation | Reporter: | advaitdixit |
Component: | man-pages | Assignee: | documentation_man-pages (documentation_man-pages) |
Status: | RESOLVED CODE_FIX | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | mtk.manpages, xerofoify |
Priority: | P1 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
URL: | http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man7/socket.7.html | ||
Kernel Version: | n/a | Subsystem: | |
Regression: | No | Bisected commit-id: |
Description
advaitdixit
2011-05-25 22:58:05 UTC
This bug is against a old man pages. Please check with a newer verison. Nick (In reply to advaitdixit from comment #0) > The socket man page says that setsockopt with level=SOL_SOCKET and > optname=SO_PRIORITY sets the TOS field in IP header: > http://www.kernel.org/doc/man-pages/online/pages/man7/socket.7.html > > However, my experiments and other web search results suggest that the socket > man page is wrong. SO_PRIORITY does not seem to set the TOS field in the IP > header. A quick scan of the kernel source also finds nothing to suggest that SO_PRIORITY sets the TOS field in the IP header. Various URLs question this text in teh man page http://mailman.isi.edu/pipermail/ns-developers/2012-September/010638.html https://athena.ecs.csus.edu/~bransone/pub/misc/netfilter_notes/qos https://ocrete.ca/2009/07/24/when-a-man-page-lies/ http://lkml.iu.edu/hypermail/linux/net/0512.3/0008.html So, I'll remove this text from socket(7) (and also similar text in ip(7)), and close this bug. Thanks. And one more URL that questioned the effect of SO_PRIORITY on IP TOS: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.man/2074 |