Bug 32432
Summary: | USB Disconnects / resets after commit b963801164618e25fbdc0cd452ce49c3628b46c8 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Drivers | Reporter: | Jools Wills (jools) |
Component: | USB | Assignee: | Greg Kroah-Hartman (greg) |
Status: | CLOSED CODE_FIX | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | florian, holken, matejken, rjw |
Priority: | P1 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Kernel Version: | 2.6.27 - 2.6.38 | Subsystem: | |
Regression: | Yes | Bisected commit-id: | |
Attachments: | patch to revert b963801164618e25fbdc0cd452ce49c3628b46c8 |
Description
Jools Wills
2011-04-01 12:54:18 UTC
small correction. I am currently running 2.6.37 with this patch Created attachment 52962 [details]
patch to revert b963801164618e25fbdc0cd452ce49c3628b46c8
On Fri, Apr 01, 2011 at 12:54:47PM +0000, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32432 > > Summary: USB Disconnects / resets after commit > b963801164618e25fbdc0cd452ce49c3628b46c8 Please post this on the linux-usb@vger.kernel.org list so the developers there can comment on it and revert it if needed. Original report in Launchpad: https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/349767 Alternative report (most probably a duplicate) with traces created with options: CONFIG_USB_STORAGE_DEBUG=y CONFIG_USB=y CONFIG_USB_DEBUG=y https://bugs.launchpad.net/linux/+bug/701011 A patch referencing this bug report has been merged in Linux v3.1-rc1: commit 004c19682884d4f40000ce1ded53f4a1d0b18206 Author: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu> Date: Tue Jul 5 12:34:05 2011 -0400 USB: EHCI: go back to using the system clock for QH unlinks All USB bugs should be sent to the linux-usb@vger.kernel.org mailing list, and not entered into bugzilla. Please bring this issue up there, if it is still a problem in the latest kernel release. you can remove the invalid tag maybe and just mark it as resolved. i believe this was all discussed and fixed for 3.1 yeh as above. fixed. is it invalid to report usb bugs to the kernel bugtracker ? it;s not obvious to users to go to the mailinglist first ? No, it is not invalid. But it's a tad bit difficult to explain. Every subsystem has different rules for reporting bugs, so it is a bit difficult for users to get it right and they are not expected to get it right. Above, Greg did just clean up orphaned bug entries and was a bit too eager to get them all closed I think. I guess he used a script to close all bugs against the usb subsystem? :-) He did probably not consider that some of these bugs were considered regressions and tracked by the regression tracking team. From a regression-tracking perspective: The normal workflow for a subsystem that doesn't want to use the bugzilla would be like this: 1. Someone reports a regression bug against USB to the bugzilla 2. He get's told to report it to the mailinglist and post a link to the bug. 3. Sometime later someone scans the regression reports and closes closed bugs. (Usually before Rafael posts his regression report) OR: 1. Someone reports a regression on a mailinglist 2. Someone (Maciej) see's it and opens a tracking-bug on the bugzilla with a reference to the mailinglist discussion 3. Sometime later someone scans the regression reports and closes closed bugs. The difficult and time-consuming part for the regression tracking is the step nr 3. Rafael will probably post some documentation about the regression-tracking workflow later on.... thanks for the clarification. |