Bug 3096

Summary: irq 11: nobody cared! on Toshiba laptop
Product: ACPI Reporter: Ville Herva (v)
Component: Config-InterruptsAssignee: Len Brown (lenb)
Status: REJECTED UNREPRODUCIBLE    
Severity: normal CC: mishu
Priority: P2    
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Kernel Version: 2.6.7-mm7, fedora kernel-2.6.6-1.435.2.3 Subsystem:
Regression: --- Bisected commit-id:
Attachments: acpidmp output

Description Ville Herva 2004-07-18 10:25:07 UTC 
I originally added info this to bug #2243, but after Len Brown advise, I opened 
a new bug.

Distribution: Fedora Core 2
Hardware Environment: Toshiba Satellite 2800-500
Software Environment:
Problem Description:

Toshiba Satellite Laptop, 650MHz PIII, Fedora Core 2 2.6.5-1.358
and kernel-2.6.6-1.435.2.3 kernels.

Rather many devices stuffed to irq11:
 11:     108761          XT-PIC  uhci_hcd, yenta, yenta, YMFPCI, eth0

Booting 2.6.5-1.358 without noacpi nor acpi=off gives:

--8<-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Linux version 2.6.5-1.358 (bhcompile@bugs.build.redhat.com) (gcc version 3.3.3 
20040412 (Red Hat Linux 3.3.3-7)) #1 Sat May 8 09:04:50 EDT 2004
ACPI: RSDP (v000 TOSHIB                                    ) @ 0x000f0170
ACPI: RSDT (v001 TOSHIB 750      0x00970814 TASM 0x04010000) @ 0x0fff0000
ACPI: FADT (v001 TOSHIB 750      0x00970814 TASM 0x04010000) @ 0x0fff0054
ACPI: DSDT (v001 TOSHIB 2800     0x20001204 MSFT 0x0100000a) @ 0x00000000
ACPI: PM-Timer IO Port: 0xee08
PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfd515, last bus=4
PCI: Using configuration type 1
mtrr: v2.0 (20020519)
ACPI: Subsystem revision 20040326
ACPI: IRQ9 SCI: Level Trigger.
    ACPI-0165: *** Error: No object was returned from [\_SB_.LNKA._STA] (Node 
11f3a7fc), AE_NOT_EXIST
    ACPI-0165: *** Error: No object was returned from [\_SB_.LNKB._STA] (Node 
11f3a6fc), AE_NOT_EXIST
    ACPI-0165: *** Error: No object was returned from [\_SB_.LNKC._STA] (Node 
11f3a5fc), AE_NOT_EXIST
    ACPI-0165: *** Error: No object was returned from [\_SB_.LNKD._STA] (Node 
11f3a4fc), AE_NOT_EXIST
    ACPI-0165: *** Error: No object was returned from [\_SB_.LNKE._STA] (Node 
11f3a3fc), AE_NOT_EXIST
    ACPI-0165: *** Error: No object was returned from [\_SB_.LNKG._STA] (Node 
11f3a2fc), AE_NOT_EXIST
    ACPI-0165: *** Error: No object was returned from [\_SB_.PCI0.FNC0.FDD_.
_STA] (Node 11f3457c), AE_NOT_EXIST
    ACPI-0165: *** Error: No object was returned from [\_SB_.PCI0.FNC0.PRT_.
_STA] (Node 11f3443c), AE_NOT_EXIST
    ACPI-0165: *** Error: No object was returned from [\_SB_.PCI0.FNC0.PRT1.
_STA] (Node 11f3435c), AE_NOT_EXIST
    ACPI-0165: *** Error: No object was returned from [\_SB_.PCI0.FNC0.PCC0.
_STA] (Node 11f3425c), AE_NOT_EXIST
ACPI: Interpreter enabled
ACPI: Using PIC for interrupt routing
ACPI: PCI Root Bridge [PCI0] (00:00)
PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00)
Transparent bridge - 0000:00:1e.0
ACPI: Power Resource [PIHD] (on)
ACPI: Power Resource [PMHD] (on)
ACPI: Power Resource [PFAN] (off)
Linux Plug and Play Support v0.97 (c) Adam Belay
usbcore: registered new driver usbfs
usbcore: registered new driver hub
ACPI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin D of device 0000:00:1f.2
ACPI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin B of device 0000:00:1f.6
ACPI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin A of device 0000:01:00.0
ACPI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin A of device 0000:02:03.0
ACPI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin A of device 0000:02:07.0
ACPI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin A of device 0000:02:08.0
ACPI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin B of device 0000:02:09.0
ACPI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin A of device 0000:02:0d.0 - using IRQ 255
ACPI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin B of device 0000:02:0d.1 - using IRQ 255
PCI: Using ACPI for IRQ routing
PCI: if you experience problems, try using option 'pci=noacpi' or even 
'acpi=off'
ACPI: Fan [FAN] (off)
ACPI: Processor [CPU0] (supports C1 C2)
ACPI: Thermal Zone [THRM] (67 C)
ACPI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin B of device 0000:00:1f.6
ACPI: AC Adapter [ADP1] (on-line)
ACPI: Battery Slot [BAT1] (battery present)
ACPI: Power Button (FF) [PWRF]
ACPI: Lid Switch [LID]
toshiba_acpi: Toshiba Laptop ACPI Extras version 0.18
toshiba_acpi:     HCI method: \_SB_.VALD.GHCI
USB Universal Host Controller Interface driver v2.2
ACPI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin D of device 0000:00:1f.2
uhci_hcd 0000:00:1f.2: UHCI Host Controller
uhci_hcd 0000:00:1f.2: irq 11, io base 0000cf80
uhci_hcd 0000:00:1f.2: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
e100: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver, 3.0.17
e100: Copyright(c) 1999-2004 Intel Corporation
ACPI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin A of device 0000:02:08.0
e100: eth0: e100_probe: addr 0xfcee7000, irq 11, MAC addr 00:00:39:34:C1:3B
e100: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver, 3.0.17
e100: Copyright(c) 1999-2004 Intel Corporation
ACPI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin A of device 0000:02:08.0
e100: eth0: e100_probe: addr 0xfcee7000, irq 11, MAC addr 00:00:39:34:C1:3B
e100: eth0: e100_watchdog: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex
PCI: Enabling device 0000:02:0d.0 (0000 -> 0002)
ACPI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin A of device 0000:02:0d.0 - using IRQ 255
Yenta: CardBus bridge found at 0000:02:0d.0 [1179:0001]
irq 11: nobody cared! (screaming interrupt?)
Call Trace:
 [<021070c9>] __report_bad_irq+0x2b/0x67
 [<02107161>] note_interrupt+0x43/0x66
 [<02107327>] do_IRQ+0x109/0x169
 [<0223007b>] sock_ioctl+0x13e/0x280
 [<0211af64>] __do_softirq+0x2c/0x73
 [<021078f5>] do_softirq+0x46/0x4d
 =======================
 [<0210737b>] do_IRQ+0x15d/0x169
 [<0210fe92>] delay_pmtmr+0xb/0x13
 [<02191439>] __delay+0x9/0xa
 [<129247fe>] yenta_probe_irq+0xa7/0x100 [yenta_socket]
 [<129249a6>] yenta_get_socket_capabilities+0x28/0x49 [yenta_socket]
 [<12924c51>] yenta_probe+0x18c/0x1d1 [yenta_socket]
 [<0219653a>] pci_device_probe_static+0x2a/0x3d
 [<02196568>] __pci_device_probe+0x1b/0x2c
 [<02196594>] pci_device_probe+0x1b/0x2d
 [<021d94ed>] bus_match+0x27/0x45
 [<021d95b9>] driver_attach+0x37/0x6a
 [<021d97cb>] bus_add_driver+0x6a/0x81
 [<021d9ab3>] driver_register+0x28/0x2c
 [<021966b9>] pci_register_driver+0x4b/0x66
 [<02127eac>] sys_init_module+0xe7/0x1bd

handlers:
[<0221522d>] (usb_hcd_irq+0x0/0x4b)
[<1292dc6e>] (e100_intr+0x0/0xe0 [e100])
Disabling IRQ #11
Yenta: ISA IRQ mask 0x0498, PCI irq 0
Socket status: 30000007
PCI: Enabling device 0000:02:0d.1 (0000 -> 0002)
ACPI: No IRQ known for interrupt pin B of device 0000:02:0d.1 - using IRQ 255
Yenta: CardBus bridge found at 0000:02:0d.1 [1179:0001]
Yenta: ISA IRQ mask 0x0498, PCI irq 0
Socket status: 30000007
--8<-----------------------------------------------------------------------

And although e100 loads and accects ifconfig without hitch, no packets ever
move. No networking. eepro100 doesn't work either.

Booting with noacpi didn't alter the situation. With "noacpi acpi=off" and
disabling pcmcia, sound and usb modules I get:

--8<-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Linux version 2.6.5-1.358 (bhcompile@bugs.build.redhat.com) (gcc version 3.3.3 
20040412 (Red Hat Linux 3.3.3-7)) #1 Sat May 8 09:04:50 EDT 2004
Kernel command line: 3 ro root=LABEL=/ rhgb noacpi nousb acpi=off
PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfd515, last bus=4
PCI: Using configuration type 1
ACPI: ACPI tables contain no PCI IRQ routing entries
PCI: Invalid ACPI-PCI IRQ routing table
PCI: Probing PCI hardware
PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00)
Transparent bridge - 0000:00:1e.0
PCI: Using IRQ router PIIX/ICH [8086/244c] at 0000:00:1f.0
PCI: IRQ 0 for device 0000:02:0d.0 doesn't match PIRQ mask - try pci=usepirqmask
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 0000:02:0d.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:02:03.0
PCI: IRQ 0 for device 0000:02:0d.1 doesn't match PIRQ mask - try pci=usepirqmask
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 0000:02:0d.1
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:00:1f.6    
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:02:07.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:02:09.0
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 0000:00:1f.6
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:02:07.0    
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:02:09.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:02:0d.1
e100: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver, 3.0.17 
e100: Copyright(c) 1999-2004 Intel Corporation
e100: eth0: e100_probe: addr 0xfcee7000, irq 11, MAC addr 00:00:39:34:C1:3B
e100: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver, 3.0.17 
e100: Copyright(c) 1999-2004 Intel Corporation
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 0000:02:08.0
e100: eth0: e100_probe: addr 0xfcee7000, irq 11, MAC addr 00:00:39:34:C1:3B
irq 11: nobody cared! (screaming interrupt?)
Call Trace:
 [<021070c9>] __report_bad_irq+0x2b/0x67
 [<02107161>] note_interrupt+0x43/0x66
 [<02107327>] do_IRQ+0x109/0x169
 [<0211af64>] __do_softirq+0x2c/0x73
 [<021078f5>] do_softirq+0x46/0x4d
 =======================
 [<0210737b>] do_IRQ+0x15d/0x169 
 [<02107707>] setup_irq+0x86/0x95
 [<128d7c6e>] e100_intr+0x0/0xe0 [e100]
 [<0210743f>] request_irq+0x88/0x9d
 [<128d8517>] e100_up+0xdc/0x11f [e100] 
 [<128d91ab>] e100_open+0x20/0x45 [e100]
 [<02235a97>] dev_open+0x5f/0xcc
 [<022369cc>] dev_change_flags+0x48/0xee
 [<02267a19>] devinet_ioctl+0x255/0x4a1
 [<022694a8>] inet_ioctl+0x47/0x73  
 [<022301a5>] sock_ioctl+0x268/0x280
 [<0214ea0e>] sys_ioctl+0x1f2/0x224
 [<0210737b>] do_IRQ+0x15d/0x169

handlers:
[<128d7c6e>] (e100_intr+0x0/0xe0 [e100])
Disabling IRQ #11
e100: eth0: e100_watchdog: link up, 100Mbps, full-duplex
eepro100.c:v1.09j-t 9/29/99 Donald Becker http://www.scyld.com/network/eepro100.
html
eepro100.c: $Revision: 1.36 $ 2000/11/17 Modified by Andrey V. Savochkin 
<saw@saw.sw.com.sg> and others
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 0000:02:08.0
eth0: OEM i82557/i82558 10/100 Ethernet, 00:00:39:34:C1:3B, IRQ 11.
  Board assembly 000000-000, Physical connectors present: RJ45
  Primary interface chip i82555 PHY #1.
  General self-test: passed.
  Serial sub-system self-test: passed. 
  Internal registers self-test: passed.
  ROM checksum self-test: passed (0x04f4518b).
irq 11: nobody cared! (screaming interrupt?)
Call Trace:
 [<021070c9>] __report_bad_irq+0x2b/0x67
 [<02107161>] note_interrupt+0x43/0x66
 [<02107327>] do_IRQ+0x109/0x169
 [<0211af64>] __do_softirq+0x2c/0x73
 [<021078f5>] do_softirq+0x46/0x4d
 =======================
 [<0210737b>] do_IRQ+0x15d/0x169 
 [<02107707>] setup_irq+0x86/0x95
 [<128d77de>] speedo_interrupt+0x0/0x19a [eepro100]
 [<0210743f>] request_irq+0x88/0x9d
 [<128d6ae6>] speedo_open+0x79/0x175 [eepro100]
 [<02235a97>] dev_open+0x5f/0xcc
 [<022369cc>] dev_change_flags+0x48/0xee
 [<02267a19>] devinet_ioctl+0x255/0x4a1
 [<022694a8>] inet_ioctl+0x47/0x73  
 [<022301a5>] sock_ioctl+0x268/0x280
 [<0214ea0e>] sys_ioctl+0x1f2/0x224

handlers:
[<128d77de>] (speedo_interrupt+0x0/0x19a [eepro100])
Disabling IRQ #11
--8<-----------------------------------------------------------------------

Somehow ACPI still rears it head in the kernel messages despite acpi=off.

After upgrading to kernel-2.6.6-1.435.2.3, I still get the oopses when
loading just about any module that touches irq11, e100 and eppro100 in
particular (no networking), but sound doesn't work either. I've no usb nor
pcmcia gear, so I can't tell about that.

Giving "noacpi acpi=off" seems to do its deeds though - I can load and use
e100 just fine. Sound works too, but (at least once) shortly afterwards
networking seized.

--8<-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Linux version 2.6.6-1.435.2.3 (bhcompile@tweety.build.redhat.com) (gcc version 
3.3.3 20040412 (Red Hat Linux 3.3.3-7)) #1 Thu Jul 1 08:25:29 EDT 2004
Kernel command line: ro root=LABEL=/ rhgb noacpi acpi=off
PCI: PCI BIOS revision 2.10 entry at 0xfd515, last bus=4
PCI: Using configuration type 1
ACPI: Subsystem revision 20040326
ACPI: Interpreter disabled.
PCI: Probing PCI hardware
PCI: Probing PCI hardware (bus 00)
PCI: Transparent bridge - 0000:00:1e.0
PCI: Using IRQ router PIIX/ICH [8086/244c] at 0000:00:1f.0
PCI: IRQ 0 for device 0000:02:0d.0 doesn't match PIRQ mask - try pci=usepirqmask
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 0000:02:0d.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:02:03.0
PCI: IRQ 0 for device 0000:02:0d.1 doesn't match PIRQ mask - try pci=usepirqmask
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 0000:02:0d.1
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:00:1f.6
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:02:07.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:02:09.0
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 0000:00:1f.6
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:02:07.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:02:09.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:02:0d.1
uhci_hcd 0000:00:1f.2: UHCI Host Controller
uhci_hcd 0000:00:1f.2: irq 11, io base 0000cf80
uhci_hcd 0000:00:1f.2: new USB bus registered, assigned bus number 1
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 0000:02:03.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:02:0d.0
ohci1394: fw-host0: OHCI-1394 1.0 (PCI): IRQ=[11]  MMIO=[fceff800-fcefffff]  Max 
Packet=[2048]
e100: Intel(R) PRO/100 Network Driver, 3.0.18
e100: Copyright(c) 1999-2004 Intel Corporation
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 0000:02:08.0
e100: eth0: e100_probe: addr 0xfcee7000, irq 11, MAC addr 00:00:39:34:C1:3B
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 0000:02:0d.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:02:03.0
Yenta: CardBus bridge found at 0000:02:0d.0 [1179:0001]
Yenta: ISA IRQ mask 0x0498, PCI irq 11
Socket status: 30000007
PCI: Found IRQ 11 for device 0000:02:0d.1
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:00:1f.6
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:02:07.0
PCI: Sharing IRQ 11 with 0000:02:09.0
Yenta: CardBus bridge found at 0000:02:0d.1 [1179:0001]
Yenta: ISA IRQ mask 0x0498, PCI irq 11
Socket status: 30000007
--8<-----------------------------------------------------------------------

With 2.4.x this machine has no problems.
Comment 1 Ville Herva 2004-07-18 10:27:08 UTC 
The problem remains the same with 2.6.7-mm7.

full acpi, nor "noacpi" work. With "noacpi acpi=off", it works. 
The full acpi dmesg is in attachment #3341 [details]:

http://bugme.osdl.org/attachment.cgi?id=3341&action=view

Later I realized that I seem to have confused the (non-existent) "noacpi" 
argument with the (correct) "pci=noacpi". Using "pci=noacpi acpi=noirq" it seems 
to work.
Comment 2 Ville Herva 2004-07-29 09:48:59 UTC 
2.6.8-rc2-mm1 still has the same problem.
Comment 3 Ville Herva 2004-08-01 11:45:10 UTC 
Created attachment 3452 [details]
acpidmp output
Comment 4 Len Brown 2004-11-03 23:42:59 UTC 
> With 2.4.x this machine has no problems

Is that an ACPI-enabled 2.4.x kernel?
If yes, can you attach the dmesg and /proc/interrupts?

I expect that acpi=noirq will work(around) just as well as pci=noapic

Please attach the output from lspci -vv
Comment 5 Len Brown 2004-11-14 20:59:59 UTC 
same with 2.6.9?
Comment 6 Ville Herva 2004-11-14 22:19:34 UTC 
Sorry to be a slow responder with this. The problem is, I only get to use the 
laptop once in a while my coworkers typically use W2k on it. Once I get to use 
it again (it has been long since I used it), I'll compile a new version and send 
you lspci -vv.

Is 2.6.9, 2.6.10-rc? or 2.6.10-rc?-mm? preferable once I get to try new kernels?
Comment 7 Len Brown 2004-11-15 23:05:03 UTC 
they're all interesting, depending on if they work or not, probably in this order: 
2.6.9 
2.6.10-rc? 
2.6.10-rc?-mm?
Comment 8 Ville Herva 2004-11-17 05:16:41 UTC 
Sorry, I was hasty and went with 2.6.10-rc2-mm1 straight off. 

With this kernel, ACPI turned on, I get no "Nobody cared" messages at all. Not 
from the sound card driver, not from e100. I can even software suspend and 
resume without those messages (sound doesn't work after that, but I guess I 
could work around that by unloading sound modules first.)
Comment 9 Len Brown 2004-12-05 22:00:37 UTC 
thanks for verifying that 2.6.10-rc2-mm1 works.

yes, sound suspend/resume is a different issue,
and I noticed a fix for it in 2.6.10 today, so
you might try that again soon.

closing.