Bug 20992
| Summary: | Data corruption triggers ext4 oops | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | File System | Reporter: | Bart Van Assche (bvanassche) |
| Component: | ext4 | Assignee: | fs_ext4 (fs_ext4) |
| Status: | RESOLVED OBSOLETE | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | alan, tytso |
| Priority: | P1 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Kernel Version: | 2.6.35.7 | Subsystem: | |
| Regression: | No | Bisected commit-id: | |
| Attachments: | Kernel oops | ||
|
Description
Bart Van Assche
2010-10-23 14:39:00 UTC
Can you send the oops message, complete with the stack trace? Thanks!! Created attachment 34542 [details]
Kernel oops
Attached backtrace.
Yep, looks like a bug alright. From what I can tell, you were in the middle of async I/O, at the time when the disk was corrupted. The problem seemed to come after the I/O was completed, and ext4_convert_unwritten_extents() was trying to set the initialized bit on the extent tree. At that point the extent tree must have gotten corrupted on disk, and this seriously confused the extent conversion code, which ended up passing 0 to ext4_ext_put_in_cache() as the length of the extent, and that tripped the BUG_ON in ext4_ext_put_in_cache(). How did you corrupt the file system while it was mounted? Was it via some dd to the disk device directly? We do have code that checks to make sure the extent tree is sane, but we skip it if the data was already in the buffer cache, to save CPU costs. But if you wrote to the disk device directly, it would have gone through the buffer cache, since the extent tree was already cached, we would have skipped the validation step, and that could be the explanation for how the bug got triggered. If so, I'm loathe to turn on the validation check unconditionally, since that would kill performance. I can probably change the BUG_ON in ext4_put_in_cache() to rather set the cache state to "invalid", which would at least prevent the BUG_ON. The filesystem was probably well and truly trashed, though, so sooner or later the ext4 fs code would have hit something to cause it to be very unhappy. Hoepfully it would be an ext4_error() call to mark the file system as corrupted, as opposed to another BUG_ON. (In reply to comment #3) > How did you corrupt the file system while it was mounted? Was it via some > dd > to the disk device directly? Indeed - the filesystem was corrupted while mounted by overwriting the entire contents with dd (dd if=/dev/zero of=/dev/sd... oflag=direct). |