Bug 16213
Summary: | Some NFS/RPC file transfers fail and hang automounting | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | File System | Reporter: | Philippe Dax (dax) |
Component: | NFS | Assignee: | Trond Myklebust (trondmy) |
Status: | CLOSED CODE_FIX | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | dax, kernel-org |
Priority: | P1 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Kernel Version: | 2.6.33.5-112.fc13.x86_64 | Subsystem: | |
Regression: | No | Bisected commit-id: | |
Attachments: | SUNRPC: Fix a re-entrancy bug in xs_tcp_read_calldir() |
Description
Philippe Dax
2010-06-15 11:48:52 UTC
Are you testing NFSv4.1? The above is an error message that I would never expect to see in NFSv2/3 or ordinary NFSv4. I don't know which is the version of NFS of the Fedora-13 (Goddard) distribution, however in the /etc/sysconfig/nfs config file all lines are commented and especially : # Define which protocol versions mountd # will advertise. The values are "no" or "yes" # with yes being the default #MOUNTD_NFS_V1="no" #MOUNTD_NFS_V2="no" #MOUNTD_NFS_V3="no" # Turn off v2 and v3 protocol support #RPCNFSDARGS="-N 2 -N 3" # Turn off v4 protocol support #RPCNFSDARGS="-N 4" # Number of nfs server processes to be started. # The default is 8. #RPCNFSDCOUNT=8 What does cat /proc/self/mountinfo show on the client. Also, what does cat /proc/fs/nfsd/versions show on the server? Finally, if you do the following on the server: service nfs stop echo "-4.1" >/proc/fs/nfsd/versions service nfs start can you reproduce the bug? I don't know which is the version of NFS of the Fedora-13 (Goddard) distribution, however in the /etc/sysconfig/nfs config file all lines are commented and especially : # Define which protocol versions mountd # will advertise. The values are "no" or "yes" # with yes being the default #MOUNTD_NFS_V1="no" #MOUNTD_NFS_V2="no" #MOUNTD_NFS_V3="no" # Turn off v2 and v3 protocol support #RPCNFSDARGS="-N 2 -N 3" # Turn off v4 protocol support #RPCNFSDARGS="-N 4" # Number of nfs server processes to be started. # The default is 8. #RPCNFSDCOUNT=8 (In reply to comment #1) > Are you testing NFSv4.1? The above is an error message that I would never > expect to see in NFSv2/3 or ordinary NFSv4. ======================================================== cat /proc/self/mountinfo 17 22 0:3 / /proc rw,relatime - proc /proc rw 18 22 0:0 / /sys rw,relatime - sysfs /sys rw 19 22 0:5 / /dev rw,relatime - devtmpfs udev rw,size=2505744k,nr_inodes=626436,mode=755 20 19 0:11 / /dev/pts rw,relatime - devpts devpts rw,gid=5,mode=620,ptmxmode=000 21 19 0:17 / /dev/shm rw,relatime - tmpfs tmpfs rw 22 1 8:3 / / rw,relatime - ext4 /dev/sda3 rw,barrier=1,data=ordered 23 17 0:16 / /proc/bus/usb rw,relatime - usbfs /proc/bus/usb rw 24 22 8:1 / /boot rw,relatime - ext4 /dev/sda1 rw,barrier=1,data=ordered 25 17 0:18 / /proc/sys/fs/binfmt_misc rw,relatime - binfmt_misc none rw 26 22 0:19 / /var/lib/nfs/rpc_pipefs rw,relatime - rpc_pipefs sunrpc rw 27 22 0:20 / /misc rw,relatime - autofs /etc/auto.misc rw,fd=7,pgrp=1358,timeout=300,minproto=5,maxproto=5,indirect 28 22 0:21 / /net rw,relatime - autofs -hosts rw,fd=13,pgrp=1358,timeout=300,minproto=5,maxproto=5,indirect 29 22 0:22 / /usr/local rw,relatime - autofs /etc/auto_direct rw,fd=19,pgrp=1358,timeout=300,minproto=5,maxproto=5,direct 30 22 0:23 / /infres rw,relatime - autofs /etc/auto.indirect.infres rw,fd=24,pgrp=1358,timeout=300,minproto=5,maxproto=5,indirect 31 22 0:24 / /cal rw,relatime - autofs /etc/auto.indirect.cal rw,fd=30,pgrp=1358,timeout=300,minproto=5,maxproto=5,indirect 32 22 0:25 / /comelec rw,relatime - autofs /etc/auto.indirect.comelec rw,fd=36,pgrp=1358,timeout=300,minproto=5,maxproto=5,indirect 33 22 0:26 / /tsi rw,relatime - autofs /etc/auto.indirect.tsi rw,fd=42,pgrp=1358,timeout=300,minproto=5,maxproto=5,indirect 34 22 0:27 / /enst rw,relatime - autofs /etc/auto.indirect.enst rw,fd=48,pgrp=1358,timeout=300,minproto=5,maxproto=5,indirect 35 22 0:28 / /stud rw,relatime - autofs /etc/auto.indirect.stud rw,fd=54,pgrp=1358,timeout=300,minproto=5,maxproto=5,indirect 38 29 0:29 / /usr/local rw,relatime - nfs lame4.enst.fr:/usr/local rw,vers=3,rsize=32768,wsize=32768,namlen=255,soft,proto=tcp,timeo=600,retrans=2,sec=sys,mountaddr=137.194.192.104,mountvers=3,mountport=635,mountproto=udp,addr=137.194.192.104 For the Nfs server, I don't know, it is a NAS and these commands doesn't exist. I have only nfsstat, nfsmount, nfsumount. nfsstat on the NAS server seems live with Nfs2 and Nfs3: Server rpc: Connection oriented calls -1446287487, Connectionless calls 93776991 RPC errors: bad-prog bad-ver bad-proc auth-err garbage 765056 67766 0 0 0 93776991 Version 2: (108151472 calls) null getattr setattr root lookup readlink 7098 60982987 122213 0 46197218 125 read wrcache write create remove rename 311767 0 476180 7651 11141 4671 link symlink mkdir rmdir readdir statfs 1133 267 1890 56 6607 20468 Version 3: (-229782239 calls) null getattr setattr lookup access readlink 2174031 -1988680268 40795922 1828978961 -1387801541 180174 read write create mkdir symlink mknod 610846355 604537531 14705319 1794849 47359 86 remove rmdir rename link readdir readdirplus 7652932 651056 1939331 148409 3457234 8980470 fsstat fsinfo pathconf commit 3801848 1282010 312497 14413164 If I use a classic server on an Unix machine the problem doesn't occur, for example a Solaris10 machine. Then I suspect the NAS, but the client should not crash if NFS versions are differents on both sides. Morever, the problem doesn't occur if the kernel version is 2.6.32 used by Fedora 12 distribution. I was obliged to downgrade 30 machines from Fedora-13 to Fedora-12. Created attachment 26815 [details] SUNRPC: Fix a re-entrancy bug in xs_tcp_read_calldir() If the attempt to read the calldir fails, then instead of storing the read bytes, we currently discard them. This leads to a garbage final result when upon re-entry to the same routine, we read the remaining bytes. Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Does the above attachment help in any way? (In reply to comment #8) > Does the above attachment help in any way? Yes obviously, for your fix, thanks a lot for your efficiency :-) But, now what can I do ? Change sunrpc.tcp_slot_table_entries = 32 ? or an other alternative ? Many thanks for your work ! Philippe Hi Philippe, I'm not sure that I really understand your reply above. Are you saying that the hang is fixed, or that there is no change? I'm obviously interested in chasing this regression down, so please give me any details that you think might be relevant. To try to answer your question: the sunrpc.tcp_slot_table_entries value may have an effect on the write performance of the client, but it can not explain a hang. If you are still seeing a hang when copying the file, then there is still a bug out there for me to fix. Cheers Trond (In reply to comment #10) > Hi Philippe, > > I'm not sure that I really understand your reply above. Are you saying that > the > hang is fixed, or that there is no change? I'm obviously interested in > chasing > this regression down, so please give me any details that you think might be > relevant. > > To try to answer your question: the sunrpc.tcp_slot_table_entries value may > have an effect on the write performance of the client, but it can not explain > a > hang. If you are still seeing a hang when copying the file, then there is > still > a bug out there for me to fix. > > Cheers > Trond I am sorry to have been confused. When you said "SUNRPC: Fix a re-entrancy bug in xs_tcp_read_calldir()" I beleived you have fixed the bug. What should I do now ? Apply this patch by recompiling the kernel and try again to check if the bug is still there ? Yes please. Apply the patch, recompile, and then try to reproduce the bug. I have recompiled the kernel with your patch. Everything works finely ! No hangs. Thanks, Philippe Cool! Thank you very much for testing! I'll queue this up for Linus and will also Cc: the stable kernels. (In reply to comment #7) > SUNRPC: Fix a re-entrancy bug in xs_tcp_read_calldir() Sorry, I'm not familiar with the kernel source. Is this fix now related to NFS only? My system hangs when copying large amounts of data to USB or IDE. Hi Holger. What you are seeing would be an entirely different bug. Have you filed a bug report to the relevant maintainers of the filesystem on your USB+IDE drives? |