Bug 15307
Summary: | irq11: nobody cared, during yenta registration | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Platform Specific/Hardware | Reporter: | Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw) |
Component: | x86-64 | Assignee: | platform_x86_64 (platform_x86_64) |
Status: | CLOSED INSUFFICIENT_DATA | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | florian, linux, maciej.rutecki |
Priority: | P1 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Kernel Version: | 2.6.33-rc8 | Subsystem: | |
Regression: | Yes | Bisected commit-id: | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 13615 |
Description
Rafael J. Wysocki
2010-02-14 23:14:40 UTC
On Monday 15 February 2010, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > > Just tried 2.6.33-rcx8 on my laptop (Thinkpad X20 in a dock) that was
> > > last running 2.6.33-rc5 without problems. Gor irq11: nobody carec like
> > > below. Seems to be repeatabale. lspci also below.
> >
> > I have created the Bugzilla entry at
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15307
> > for your report.
> >
> > Peter, Ingo, did we do anything to the interrupt handling between .33-rc5
> and .33-rc8?
>
> I just retested it and the problem appears even in -rc5 (missed it
> before). Come to think of it, I only tested -rc5 out of dock before.
>
> With dock, the problem is there in 2.6.33-rc4-00399-g24bc734.
>
> Without dock, even -rc8 is OK, so it only happens docked.
On Monday 15 February 2010, Meelis Roos wrote:
> > > > I have created the Bugzilla entry at
> http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15307
> > > > for your report.
> > > >
> > > > Peter, Ingo, did we do anything to the interrupt handling between
> .33-rc5 and .33-rc8?
> > >
> > > I just retested it and the problem appears even in -rc5 (missed it
> > > before). Come to think of it, I only tested -rc5 out of dock before.
> > >
> > > With dock, the problem is there in 2.6.33-rc4-00399-g24bc734.
> > >
> > > Without dock, even -rc8 is OK, so it only happens docked.
> > >
> > > Will try to bisect but this takes time because I'm rarely near that
> > > computer.
>
> It's even worse - or my memory is, actually.
>
> With dock, both 2.6.32 and 2.6.31 exhibit the problem, so it's not a
> recent regression - but the bugzilla entry still holds.
>
> In fact, googling tells that I reported the issue back in 2006 together
> with a USB problem that I thought was related, and that has been fixed
> meanwhile:
>
> http://lkml.indiana.edu/hypermail/linux/kernel/0607.2/1331.html
>
> Strange that I haven't noticed it meanwhile.
Not a recent regression, moving to another list. What happens if you use the module parameter "isa_probe=0" for the module yenta_socket? Timeout... please post a note, if the discussed issue is still a problem. |