Bug 14394
Summary: | [PATCH]FlexCopII DVB-T PCI card does not work after resume from suspend | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | v4l-dvb | Reporter: | Stefan Bauer (stefan.andreas.bauer) |
Component: | dvb-other | Assignee: | dvb-other (v4l-dvb_dvb-other) |
Status: | NEW --- | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | alan, davy, Manfred.Knick, mchehab |
Priority: | P1 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Kernel Version: | 3.12 | Subsystem: | |
Regression: | No | Bisected commit-id: |
Description
Stefan Bauer
2009-10-12 19:20:46 UTC
Running $ rmmod b2c2_flexcop_pci $ modprobe b2c2_flexcop_pci after resume fixes the problem. Still reproducible on 2.6.33-rc6. I have the same trouble, but with a completely different DVB card driven by the saa7134 kernel (2.6.33.5) module: 01:01.0 Multimedia controller: Philips Semiconductors SAA7131/SAA7133/SAA7135 Video Broadcast Decoder (rev d1) Please note the patch provided in https://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=288267#c7 which I can confirm up to / including 3.3.1. See Documentation/SubmittingPatches The kernel community don't magically get copies of patches buried in an obscure distribution bugzilla. If you want it fixed then it wants emailing to linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org and that should do the trick. (In reply to comment #5) > See Documentation/SubmittingPatches O.k. I understand and respect that "The kernel community" is not willing to appreciate anything less than fist-grade five-star patches, provided via old-days mailing lists without committed procedure how to handle them ... Then I have to admit that I do not understand what this official bugzilla has been crated for, with its well-designed mechanisms like "status", "importance", "assigned to" etc.? > The kernel community don't magically get copies of patches that's why I forwarded the information here: into kernel.org's _official_ buzgzilla. > buried I admit I did not see any sense in duplicating the information provided by one click upon the link. > in an obscure distribution bugzilla. Sorry, but naming Gentoo like that is - at least - missing the very basic minimum of respect, to put it politely. Alan, I would never ever dare to de-respect YOUR valuable work like that. > If you want it fixed then it wants emailing to > > linux-media@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org > > and that should do the trick. Thank you very much for pointing that out to me. I always value disillusionment. I'm not a kernel developer. Nevertheless I did the testing one kernel version after another and only wanted to share my experience. To date, this HW is not in use in my boxes any more, thus I'm not able to supply to your standard as expected above - with patches tested against the very newest kernel line. I'm sorry. Thanks again. The official bugzilla is a complete mess, which is why I'm currently attacking it to try and do something about it. Patches however do need a sign off and do need to go via the mailing list. We also have a procedure for handling them - its Documentation/SubmittingBugs I would have said 3.3.1 was fine. As to "obscure bugzilla", there are bugzillas and other trackers for just about every distribution on the planet, by the hundred. Gentoo is a pretty obscure one. Doesn't make it unimportant but it's simply not a place people are going to notice bugs and fixes. It's not about respect. Anyway if you add a signed off line to it and send it to the list I'd expect it'll end up in the kernel with the appropriate attributions fairly promptly. Alan The patch was already sent to the linux-media list: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.drivers.video-input-infrastructure/46854 |