Bug 12757
Summary: | [BISECT]kernels later than 2.6.26.8 die at cardbus init on laptop | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Platform Specific/Hardware | Reporter: | Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw) |
Component: | i386 | Assignee: | ykzhao (yakui.zhao) |
Status: | CLOSED CODE_FIX | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | acpi-bugzilla, alan, dtpflug, florian, mingo |
Priority: | P1 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Kernel Version: | 2.6.28 | Subsystem: | |
Regression: | Yes | Bisected commit-id: | |
Bug Depends on: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 11167 |
Description
Rafael J. Wysocki
2009-02-23 14:32:21 UTC
Hi, David Will you please attach the output of acpidump, lspci -vxxx? It will be great if you can attach the output of dmesg when the following boot option is added: a. pci=noacpi b. noapic c. acpi=off Will you please confirm whether the box can be booted normally when using the previous kernel(2.6.26.x)? If so, it will be a regression. Will you please use git-bisect to identify the commit which causes the regression? thanks. *** Bug 12784 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** noapic freezes at the same place. That was one of the first things I tried. pci=noacpi: http://pastebin.com/f1ee0c148 acpi=off: http://pastebin.com/fc2898c4 lspci -vxxx: http://pastebin.com/f738f61dd acpidump: http://pastebin.com/f56c9ed77 2.6.26 and the git-bisect will have to wait til the morn. I'm about to fall asleep on the keys. 2.6.26.8 boots fine. I'll get started on the git-bisect. Handled-By : Zhao Yakui <yakui.zhao@intel.com> It turns out to be a regression from 2.6.26.8 (ie. before 2.6.27). Moving to the other list. Hi, David Can the box be booted if the boot option of "noapic" is added? It will be great if you can use the git-bisect to identify the commit which causes the regression. Thanks. noapic was one of the first things I tried. It doesn't help. git bisect says 5b34653963de7a6d0d8c783527457d68fddc60fb I have no idea how those changes could be causing a problem, but there you go. I can post the full bisect log if you like. Is there anything else I can/should do for you? I don't know what changed, and doing a git bisect to figure out what's fixed would probably be a waste of time. But it works with 2.6.33. :) Thanks! cool. so this bug can be closed. cool. so this bug can be closed. if you are up to an git-bisect for the fix, it could be backported to the stable trees. but don't feel obligated to it. |