Bug 12156
Summary: | v2.6.28-rc2: x86_32 relocation regression? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Platform Specific/Hardware | Reporter: | Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw) |
Component: | i386 | Assignee: | platform_i386 |
Status: | CLOSED OBSOLETE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | alan, vegard.nossum |
Priority: | P1 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Kernel Version: | 2.6.28-rc2 | Subsystem: | |
Regression: | Yes | Bisected commit-id: |
Description
Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-12-03 14:30:33 UTC
On Sunday, 21 of December 2008, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> wrote:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.27. Please verify if it still should be listed and let me know
> > (either way).
> >
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=12156
> > Subject : v2.6.28-rc2: x86_32 relocation regression?
> > Submitter : Vegard Nossum <vegard.nossum@gmail.com>
> > Date : 2008-11-24 21:19 (27 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=122756158220966&w=4
>
> not really a regression but a long-standing inconvenience/bug of the debug
> symbols of relocatable kernels. (ever since relocatable kernels were added
> in '06 or so.) Nevertheless we queued up a revert of the defconfig change
> for .29, to not expose it in the defconfig:
>
> f269b07: x86: revert CONFIG_RELOCATABLE=y defconfig change
>
> so i think it can be taken off the regressions list.
Taking off the list of recent regressions. |