Bug 10827
| Summary: | 2.6.26rc4 GFS2 oops. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | File System | Reporter: | Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw) |
| Component: | Other | Assignee: | fs_other |
| Status: | CLOSED CODE_FIX | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | bunk, davej |
| Priority: | P1 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Kernel Version: | 2.6.26-rc4 | Subsystem: | |
| Regression: | Yes | Bisected commit-id: | |
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 10492 | ||
|
Description
Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-05-29 14:56:41 UTC
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:12:03PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> of recent regressions.
>
> The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed.
>
>
> Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10827
> Subject : 2.6.26rc4 GFS2 oops.
> Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com>
> Date : 2008-05-27 15:44 (19 days old)
> References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/27/297
Dave, what is the status of this bug?
It's currently listed as a 2.6.26-rc regression.
Is it actually confirmed that 2.6.25 is fine?
According to the thread of the bug report there should now be a bug
report in the Red Hat Bugzilla for it. Bug number?
Thanks
Adrian
Reply-To: rpeterso@redhat.com On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 12:09 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:12:03PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of recent regressions. > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10827 > > Subject : 2.6.26rc4 GFS2 oops. > > Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> > > Date : 2008-05-27 15:44 (19 days old) > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/27/297 > > Dave, what is the status of this bug? > > It's currently listed as a 2.6.26-rc regression. > > Is it actually confirmed that 2.6.25 is fine? > > According to the thread of the bug report there should now be a bug > report in the Red Hat Bugzilla for it. Bug number? > > Thanks > Adrian Hi, This appears to be a known bug. There's a Fedora bugzilla record for it here, which contains a patch to fix the problem: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448866 The bug does not appear to be in 2.6.25; 2.6.25 is fine afaict. Regards, Bob Peterson Red Hat GFS Handled-By : Bob Peterson <rpeterso@redhat.com> Patch : https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=309757 On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 09:40:39AM -0500, Bob Peterson wrote: > On Sun, 2008-06-22 at 12:09 +0300, Adrian Bunk wrote: > > On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:12:03PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > > of recent regressions. > > > > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > > from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed. > > > > > > > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10827 > > > Subject : 2.6.26rc4 GFS2 oops. > > > Submitter : Dave Jones <davej@redhat.com> > > > Date : 2008-05-27 15:44 (19 days old) > > > References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/27/297 > > > > Dave, what is the status of this bug? > > > > It's currently listed as a 2.6.26-rc regression. > > > > Is it actually confirmed that 2.6.25 is fine? > > > > According to the thread of the bug report there should now be a bug > > report in the Red Hat Bugzilla for it. Bug number? > > > > Thanks > > Adrian > > Hi, > > This appears to be a known bug. There's a Fedora bugzilla record for > it here, which contains a patch to fix the problem: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=448866 Thanks for the pointer. > The bug does not appear to be in 2.6.25; 2.6.25 is fine afaict. Yup, the patch in your Bugzilla is for code that is new in 2.6.26. Can you push your patch for inclusion into 2.6.26 so that 2.6.26 won't get released with this regression? > Regards, > > Bob Peterson > Red Hat GFS Thanks Adrian Reply-To: rpeterso@redhat.com > Yup, the patch in your Bugzilla is for code that is new in 2.6.26. > > Can you push your patch for inclusion into 2.6.26 so that 2.6.26 won't > get released with this regression? > > Thanks > Adrian Hi Adrian, Unfortunately, I cannot. All access to the gfs2 "-nmw" git tree is controlled by Steve Whitehouse, and he is on vacation/holiday until tomorrow. I've submitted the patch to cluster-devel, so hopefully he'll push it as soon as he returns tomorrow. Regards, Bob Peterson Red Hat GFS fixed by commit 17c15da00c0e7289375ad57e8fea0c7892b74aa0 |