Bug 10741
| Summary: | bug in `tty: BKL pushdown'? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Drivers | Reporter: | Rafael J. Wysocki (rjw) |
| Component: | Other | Assignee: | drivers_other |
| Status: | RESOLVED UNREPRODUCIBLE | ||
| Severity: | normal | CC: | alan, hannes, mingo |
| Priority: | P1 | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Kernel Version: | Commit 04f378b198da233ca0aca341b113dc6579d46123 | Subsystem: | |
| Regression: | Yes | Bisected commit-id: | |
| Bug Depends on: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 10492 | ||
|
Description
Rafael J. Wysocki
2008-05-18 03:51:35 UTC
Appears to be a bug in the user space apps. Can't duplicate this behaviour I have screen running in LANG=en_US.utf8 and LC_COLLATE=C and screen windows and display in utf8 mode (utf8 on on), I forgot to mention. Perhaps this makes any difference. None at all. Works perfectly for me. If this patch only changes the way the code is locked (without intented effects to userspace) how could this possibly happen? Maybe an unreliable bisection result? I will rerun the bisection session, perhaps I overlooked something. Alan, you need at least a caption (or hardstatus) # .screenrc: caption always "%-Lw %n%f* %t +%Lw" for example. If neither are enabled, no breakage. still doesn't break for me... 8( Problem has been confirmed to be present in 2.6.26-rc6-git2. References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/16/104 On Sunday, 22 of June 2008, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed.
>
> Yup.
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10741
> > Subject : bug in `tty: BKL pushdown'?
> > Submitter : Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de>
> > Date : 2008-05-18 2:16 (36 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121107706506181&w=4
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/16/104
> > Handled-By : Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
On Thursday, 3 of July 2008, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed.
>
> Yeah, it still exists.
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10741
> > Subject : bug in `tty: BKL pushdown'?
> > Submitter : Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de>
> > Date : 2008-05-18 2:16 (43 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121107706506181&w=4
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/16/104
> > Handled-By : Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
On Sunday, 6 of July 2008, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl> writes:
>
> > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report
> > of recent regressions.
> >
> > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions
> > from 2.6.25. Please verify if it still should be listed.
>
> Yes.
>
> > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10741
> > Subject : bug in `tty: BKL pushdown'?
> > Submitter : Johannes Weiner <hannes@saeurebad.de>
> > Date : 2008-05-18 2:16 (50 days old)
> > References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=121107706506181&w=4
> > http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/6/16/104
> > Handled-By : Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
|