Most recent kernel where this bug did not occur: Occurs in all 2.6.2[12] at least Distribution: Debian testing/lenny Hardware Environment: Digital PWS 433au (EV56) Software Environment: Linux utopia 2.6.22-rc7-git7 #1 Thu Jul 8 10:34:17 CDT 2027 alpha GNU/Linux Gnu C 4.2.1 Gnu make 3.81 binutils (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.17.50.20070426 util-linux 2.12r mount 2.12r module-init-tools 3.3-pre11 e2fsprogs 1.40-WIP xfsprogs 2.8.18 Linux C Library > libc.2.5 Dynamic linker (ldd) 2.5 Procps 3.2.7 Net-tools 1.60 Kbd 85: Sh-utils 5.97 udev 105 Modules Loaded ipt_TOS xt_multiport xt_tcpudp xt_state ip6table_mangle ip6table_filter ip6_tables ipv6 iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 nf_conntrack iptable_mangle iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables dm_mod serio_raw mxser_new ide_generic via_rhine mii generic ide_core tulip bitrev crc32 sg sr_mod cdrom raid1 md_mod loop Problem Description: kernel unaligned acc : 2248 (pc=fffffc0000583de4,va=fffffc00071c382a) fffffc0000583bc0 T udp_recvmsg fffffc0000583ed0 T udp_destroy_sock kernel unaligned acc : 1231 (pc=fffffc0000585190,va=fffffc000795e02e) fffffc0000585120 T __udp4_lib_rcv fffffc0000585bf0 T udp_rcv This problem does NOT seem to affect my Tsunami/Shark (EV68AL) box running the same kernel version on the same LAN. Not sure if it's CPU generation related (EV5 vs EV6), or if it's the NIC (via_rhine on the EV5 vs e100 on the EV6). Steps to reproduce: According to tshark, the only UDP packets are DHCP packets: 1815064200.131003 10.5.128.1 -> 255.255.255.255 DHCP DHCP Offer - Transaction ID 0x27c6
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] New: Unaligned acess in udp_recvmsg() on EV56 On Sun, 8 Jul 2007 14:30:17 -0700 (PDT) bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=8724 > > Summary: Unaligned acess in udp_recvmsg() on EV56 > Product: Platform Specific/Hardware > Version: 2.5 > KernelVersion: 2.6.22-rc7-git7 > Platform: All > OS/Version: Linux > Tree: Mainline > Status: NEW > Severity: normal > Priority: P1 > Component: Alpha > AssignedTo: rth@twiddle.net > ReportedBy: jailbird@alcatraz.fdf.net > > > Most recent kernel where this bug did not occur: Occurs in all 2.6.2[12] at > least > Distribution: Debian testing/lenny > Hardware Environment: Digital PWS 433au (EV56) > Software Environment: > Linux utopia 2.6.22-rc7-git7 #1 Thu Jul 8 10:34:17 CDT 2027 alpha GNU/Linux > > Gnu C 4.2.1 > Gnu make 3.81 > binutils (GNU Binutils for Debian) 2.17.50.20070426 > util-linux 2.12r > mount 2.12r > module-init-tools 3.3-pre11 > e2fsprogs 1.40-WIP > xfsprogs 2.8.18 > Linux C Library > libc.2.5 > Dynamic linker (ldd) 2.5 > Procps 3.2.7 > Net-tools 1.60 > Kbd 85: > Sh-utils 5.97 > udev 105 > Modules Loaded ipt_TOS xt_multiport xt_tcpudp xt_state > ip6table_mangle > ip6table_filter ip6_tables ipv6 iptable_nat nf_nat nf_conntrack_ipv4 > nf_conntrack iptable_mangle iptable_filter ip_tables x_tables dm_mod > serio_raw > mxser_new ide_generic via_rhine mii generic ide_core tulip bitrev crc32 sg > sr_mod cdrom raid1 md_mod loop > > Problem Description: > kernel unaligned acc : 2248 (pc=fffffc0000583de4,va=fffffc00071c382a) > > fffffc0000583bc0 T udp_recvmsg > fffffc0000583ed0 T udp_destroy_sock > > kernel unaligned acc : 1231 (pc=fffffc0000585190,va=fffffc000795e02e) > > fffffc0000585120 T __udp4_lib_rcv > fffffc0000585bf0 T udp_rcv > > This problem does NOT seem to affect my Tsunami/Shark (EV68AL) box running > the > same kernel version on the same LAN. Not sure if it's CPU generation related > (EV5 vs EV6), or if it's the NIC (via_rhine on the EV5 vs e100 on the EV6). > > Steps to reproduce: > According to tshark, the only UDP packets are DHCP packets: > > 1815064200.131003 10.5.128.1 -> 255.255.255.255 DHCP DHCP Offer - > Transaction ID 0x27c6 > > That output isn't terribly illuminating. We'd need to work out which code corresponds with pc=fffffc0000583de4 and pc=fffffc0000585190. I don't think there's necessarily a bug here: that's just the kernel telling us that there are unaligned accesses which got successfully fixed up, so we're being perhaps a bit inefficient. Yes?
I'm sorry if it doesn't help that much. I'm pretty sure years ago I had instructions on finding out which instruction was causing the access via gdb, but I can't seen to find them. I was under the impression that any unaligned access by the kernel was a "bug". If I'm worry, I apologize.
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] New: Unaligned acess in udp_recvmsg() on EV56 On Thu, 12 Jul 2007 12:45:26 -0500 Dustin Marquess <jailbird@alcatraz.dnsalias.net> wrote: > Bingo! That did it. > > I copied/modified the #ifdef from tulip_core.c: > > /* Set the copy breakpoint for the copy-only-tiny-buffer Rx structure. */ > #if defined(__alpha__) || defined(__arm__) || defined(__hppa__) \ > || defined(CONFIG_SPARC) || defined(__ia64__) \ > || defined(__sh__) || defined(__mips__) > static int rx_copybreak = 1518; > #else > static int rx_copybreak; > #endif > > And that seems to have worked like a champ. Can you send us a patch please? http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/tpp.txt and http://linux.yyz.us/patch-format.html contain some guidelines. Thanks.
Of course. Sorry about that! Sent!
Subject: Re: [Bugme-new] New: Unaligned acess in udp_recvmsg() on EV56 Bingo! That did it. I copied/modified the #ifdef from tulip_core.c: /* Set the copy breakpoint for the copy-only-tiny-buffer Rx structure. */ #if defined(__alpha__) || defined(__arm__) || defined(__hppa__) \ || defined(CONFIG_SPARC) || defined(__ia64__) \ || defined(__sh__) || defined(__mips__) static int rx_copybreak = 1518; #else static int rx_copybreak; #endif And that seems to have worked like a champ. Thanks for the help. I knew I was asking for problems by using non-Digital hardware in an Alpha :). -Dustin Ivan Kokshaysky wrote: > On Sun, Jul 08, 2007 at 03:29:35PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > >>> This problem does NOT seem to affect my Tsunami/Shark (EV68AL) box running >>> the >>> same kernel version on the same LAN. Not sure if it's CPU generation >>> related >>> (EV5 vs EV6), or if it's the NIC (via_rhine on the EV5 vs e100 on the EV6). >>> > > It is the NIC, I suppose. > > >> I don't think there's necessarily a bug here: that's just the kernel >> telling us that there are unaligned accesses which got successfully >> fixed up, so we're being perhaps a bit inefficient. Yes? >> > > Sort of. It's not exactly a bug, just an old and well known problem > with ethernet controllers that can do DMA only at 32-bit boundaries, > so the IP headers are not properly aligned. A workaround is to > disable "rx_copybreak" feature, either by passing "rx_copybreak=1536" > to the driver, or add #ifdef to via_rhine.c, like tulip, starfire and > many other drivers have: > > /* > * Set the copy breakpoint for the copy-only-tiny-frames scheme. > * Setting to > 1518 effectively disables this feature. > * > * NOTE: > * The ia64 doesn't allow for unaligned loads even of integers being > * misaligned on a 2 byte boundary. Thus always force copying of > * packets as the starfire doesn't allow for misaligned DMAs ;-( > * 23/10/2000 - Jes > * > * The Alpha and the Sparc don't like unaligned loads, either. On Sparc64, > * at least, having unaligned frames leads to a rather serious performance > * penalty. -Ion > */ > #if defined(__ia64__) || defined(__alpha__) || defined(__sparc__) > static int rx_copybreak = PKT_BUF_SZ; > #else > static int rx_copybreak /* = 0 */; > #endif > > Ivan. > >
via_rhine has copybreak ifdefs now