Bug 6517 - VIA K8T890: irq 10: nobody cared - acpi_irq - AMD64 X2
Summary: VIA K8T890: irq 10: nobody cared - acpi_irq - AMD64 X2
Status: REJECTED UNREPRODUCIBLE
Alias: None
Product: ACPI
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Config-Interrupts (show other bugs)
Hardware: i386 Linux
: P2 normal
Assignee: Len Brown
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-05-08 09:08 UTC by Miroslaw Mieszczak
Modified: 2007-03-30 19:05 UTC (History)
2 users (show)

See Also:
Kernel Version: 2.6.16
Subsystem:
Regression: ---
Bisected commit-id:


Attachments
Dmesg (23.89 KB, text/plain)
2006-05-08 09:09 UTC, Miroslaw Mieszczak
Details
lspci (13.78 KB, application/octet-stream)
2006-05-08 09:10 UTC, Miroslaw Mieszczak
Details
kernel config file (37.62 KB, text/plain)
2006-05-08 09:10 UTC, Miroslaw Mieszczak
Details
cpuinfo (1.25 KB, application/octet-stream)
2006-05-08 09:11 UTC, Miroslaw Mieszczak
Details
contents of /proc/interrupts (901 bytes, application/octet-stream)
2006-05-08 09:12 UTC, Miroslaw Mieszczak
Details

Description Miroslaw Mieszczak 2006-05-08 09:08:35 UTC
Most recent kernel where this bug did not occur: don't know
Distribution: gentoo
Hardware Environment: AMD64 Athlon X2 4200+
Software Environment: 
Problem Description:
When system is booted with smp, after some random time (hours), usb mouse
polling change - mouse is jumping. In system log I found following:

May  8 08:03:30 [kernel] irq 10: nobody cared (try booting with the "irqpoll"
option)
May  8 08:03:30 [kernel] Call Trace: <IRQ> <ffffffff80150334>{__report_bad_irq+48}
May  8 08:03:30 [kernel]        <ffffffff80150559>{note_interrupt+472}
<ffffffff8014fe7c>{__do_IRQ+183}
May  8 08:03:30 [kernel]        <ffffffff8010d49f>{do_IRQ+57}
<ffffffff80108cd9>{default_idle+0}
May  8 08:03:30 [kernel]        <ffffffff8010af30>{ret_from_intr+0} <EOI>
<ffffffff80108d04>{default_idle+43}
May  8 08:03:30 [kernel]        <ffffffff80108f3a>{cpu_idle+151}
<ffffffff805a27d0>{start_kernel+444}
May  8 08:03:30 [kernel]        <ffffffff805a22a7>{_sinittext+679}
May  8 08:03:30 [kernel] handlers:
May  8 08:03:30 [kernel] [<ffffffff802ff630>] (acpi_irq+0x0/0x18)

In /proc/interrupts I observed that ACPI interrupt (IRQ 10) started to increment
with very high speed - thousands interrupts per second.

Steps to reproduce:
Switch on system with SMP on, and normal work.
Comment 1 Miroslaw Mieszczak 2006-05-08 09:09:18 UTC
Created attachment 8053 [details]
Dmesg
Comment 2 Miroslaw Mieszczak 2006-05-08 09:10:10 UTC
Created attachment 8054 [details]
lspci
Comment 3 Miroslaw Mieszczak 2006-05-08 09:10:52 UTC
Created attachment 8055 [details]
kernel config file
Comment 4 Miroslaw Mieszczak 2006-05-08 09:11:55 UTC
Created attachment 8056 [details]
cpuinfo
Comment 5 Miroslaw Mieszczak 2006-05-08 09:12:33 UTC
Created attachment 8057 [details]
contents of /proc/interrupts
Comment 6 Miroslaw Mieszczak 2006-05-09 01:58:47 UTC
I found that there are 2 independent things. The one is with ACPI interrupt.
Right now it happen 1 time.
The other one is with USB interrupts, I will make separate bug report for it.
Comment 7 Len Brown 2006-05-18 01:43:03 UTC
As it works for hours before the failure, I expect
that the SCI on IRQ10 is working properly and that
the problem at hand is some sort of run-time error.

If you kill acpid and cat /proc/acpi/event
and then press the power button a bunch of times,
do you see an event for each press?

Does the failure occur also if you boot with "maxcpus=1"?
Comment 8 Miroslaw Mieszczak 2006-05-18 10:34:44 UTC
When I killed acpid, and press power button, then after each time the button was
released there was generated an event:
button/power PWRB 00000080 000000xx
where xx is autoincremented event No

also I got several:
processor CPU0 00000080 00000000

I will try later for maxcpus=1
Comment 9 Miroslaw Mieszczak 2006-05-22 06:31:06 UTC
Now I cannot repeat the Ooops again.
Probably the condition was somehow associated with problem on Via EHCI.

I propose to make the error invalid now. If I get it again, and have more
details, I will reopen it.
Comment 10 Sérgio M Basto 2006-09-17 09:53:42 UTC
I try duplicate this bug with mine (http://bugme.osdl.org/show_bug.cgi?id=6419) , 
Please try lastest kernel 2.6.18-rc7 with 
http://lkml.org/lkml/diff/2006/9/7/235/1 patch.
and use nvidia opensource code drive
Comment 11 Len Brown 2007-03-30 19:05:00 UTC
please re-open if this is reproducible with 2.6.21-rc5 or later.

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.