Bug 5858 - wish: support ip100a ethernet card
Summary: wish: support ip100a ethernet card
Status: REJECTED DUPLICATE of bug 6691
Alias: None
Product: Drivers
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Network (show other bugs)
Hardware: i386 Linux
: P2 normal
Assignee: Francois Romieu
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2006-01-09 13:47 UTC by shietchka
Modified: 2006-06-23 09:58 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Kernel Version: 2.6.12
Subsystem:
Regression: ---
Bisected commit-id:


Attachments

Description shietchka 2006-01-09 13:47:17 UTC
Currently no distro I tried supports this card out of box (Mandrake 10.1, 10.2,
Ubuntu 5.10 - ie. kernel 2.6.12)

This card is integrated on my Abit NF7 S2 mainboard (for the record: not the
"NF7 S 2.0", that's different). (These MBs where shipped with 4 kinds of
ethernet: IP100A IP1000A, VIA 6122, VT6107).

MB Spec:
http://www2.abit.com.tw/page/en/motherboard/motherboard_detail.php?pMODEL_NAME=NF7-S2&fMTYPE=Socket%20A&pPRODINFO=Specifications

MB Manual:
ftp://ftp.abit.com.tw/pub/download/manual/english/nf7_series.zip

IP100A Driver:
http://www.icplus.com.tw/html/driver-main-IP100A.html

I managed to build and install it in both Mandrake 10.1 and 10.2 altough I'm an
absolute amateur.

Intersting is that the driver name, which I built from sources provided by the
card vendor, is "sundance", exactly like one driver shipped with Mandrake.
However, that sundance driver shipped with Mandrake doesn't work with my card
for me. But maybe it could if tweaked somehow?

After the instalation of driver provided by vendor the card is reported as:

lspci | grep -i net

02:0b.0 Ethernet controller: Sundance Technology Inc: Unknown device 0200 (rev
31)

and works fine.

See http://bugbox.blogspot.com/2005/04/abit-nf7-s2-board-ethernet-linux.html for
similar experience. 

Maciek
Comment 1 Nishanth Aravamudan 2006-01-09 13:59:34 UTC
Please talk to the driver authors and have them submit the code to LKML. This
isn't a bug for the kernel developers to deal with. Also, I take it 2.6.15 did
not work without any patches applied (you only indicate testing 2.6.12)? In any
case, I think this bug can be rejected as invalid.
Comment 2 Francois Romieu 2006-06-23 09:58:54 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 6691 ***

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.