Bug 3315 - input/output errors, smbfs lockups
Summary: input/output errors, smbfs lockups
Status: REJECTED UNREPRODUCIBLE
Alias: None
Product: File System
Classification: Unclassified
Component: Samba/SMB (show other bugs)
Hardware: i386 Linux
: P2 normal
Assignee: Diego Calleja
URL:
Keywords:
Depends on:
Blocks:
 
Reported: 2004-08-31 04:40 UTC by Johan van Baarlen
Modified: 2006-08-04 13:00 UTC (History)
1 user (show)

See Also:
Kernel Version: 2.6.7
Subsystem:
Regression: ---
Bisected commit-id:


Attachments

Description Johan van Baarlen 2004-08-31 04:40:11 UTC
Distribution: Fedora Core 1, Fedora Core 2
Hardware Environment: P4 Prescott 3.4GHz, 4G PC3200, Intel865PERL
Hardware Environment2: Athlon 64 3200+, 2G PC3200, MSI K8T-Neo
Hardware Environment3: P4 Northwood 2.8G, 1G PC3200, MSI 865PE-Neo

Kernel: 2.6.7 custom compile, preempt enabled (tried disabled, didn't matter), 
32bit on P4, 64bit on A64. 

Problem Description:
Under heavy load, smbfs grinds to a halt. Most obvious when using tail -f on a 
networked file (samba-shared from fileserver), after a couple of hours tail -f 
dies, gives input/output error. 
Even worse - under really heavy load, like trying to zip a couple of big files 
from network to a zipfile on the network, smbfs died completely, only fixable 
by hard reboot.

Steps to reproduce:
Unfortunately, not easy. I've tried to overload smbfs by running about a 
hundred tail -f simultaneously, didn't die. 5 minutes later my colleague tries 
to tail -f, almost instant failure. 
This is getting kinda ugly, three different linux-boxes using different 
fileservers (different version of linux/samba and win2k tested) showing the 
same behaviour, and not just a small bug - this makes it virtually impossible 
to work with.
I'm out of ideas for workarounds, time to call in the big shots.
Comment 1 Diego Calleja 2006-08-04 05:35:27 UTC
Does it happens in recent kernels? Have you tried to use cifs?
Comment 2 Johan van Baarlen 2006-08-04 09:36:13 UTC
This bugreport was over two years ago, I avoided it back then by using NFS, 
which is far superior to samba when it comes to unix-like permissions.
Since then, many things have changed, both to the kernel and to my hardware, 
which combined with the bad reproducability makes we doubt whether it is even 
remotely useful to try.
Comment 3 Diego Calleja 2006-08-04 12:59:48 UTC
I'll set it as "not reproducible". If it happens again, it'll be much better to
open a new bug

Note You need to log in before you can comment on or make changes to this bug.