Subject : x86_64 2.6.35.* kernels and Intel Xeon X5550 Submitter : Marc Aurele La France <tsi@ualberta.ca> Date : 2010-10-07 17:17 Message-ID : alpine.WNT.2.00.1010071055420.1672@cluij.ucs.ualberta.ca References : http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128647187628706&w=2 This entry is being used for tracking a regression from 2.6.34. Please don't close it until the problem is fixed in the mainline.
On Monday, October 18, 2010, Marc Aurele La France wrote: > On Sun, 17 Oct 2010, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > This message has been generated automatically as a part of a report > > of regressions introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. > > > The following bug entry is on the current list of known regressions > > introduced between 2.6.34 and 2.6.35. Please verify if it still should > > be listed and let the tracking team know (either way). > > > Bug-Entry : http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=20002 > > Subject : x86_64 2.6.35.* kernels and Intel Xeon X5550 > > Submitter : Marc Aurele La France <tsi@ualberta.ca> > > Date : 2010-10-07 17:17 (11 days old) > > Please delete this report, as it has been cloned as 20722, in an attempt > to remove the regression tag, as I cannot do so myself. Obviously, a lot > of damage/lobotomies have been done to this BZ implementation compared to > the one I know.
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 20722 ***
Created attachment 34302 [details] testing attachments