This is a patch for Otus driver that provide support for WN111v2 USB 802.11n adapter. Sources tree: OAL/Otus/Linux Signed-off-by: Daniele Napolitano <dnax88@gmail.com> --- zdusb.h.orig 2009-04-10 17:48:17.620423000 +0200 +++ zdusb.h 2009-04-10 17:54:41.356419568 +0200 @@ -26,5 +26,9 @@ #define VENDOR_DLINK 0x07D1 //Dlink #define PRODUCT_DWA160A 0x3C10 + +#define VENDOR_NETGEAR 0x0846 //NetGear +#define PRODUCT_WNDA3100 0x9010 +#define PRODUCT_WN111v2 0x9001 #endif Signed-off-by: Daniele Napolitano <dnax88@gmail.com> --- zdusb.c.orig 2009-04-10 17:48:17.620423000 +0200 +++ zdusb.c 2009-04-10 17:53:15.316421516 +0200 @@ -36,7 +36,8 @@ static struct usb_device_id zd1221_ids [] = { { USB_DEVICE(VENDOR_ATHR, PRODUCT_AR9170) }, { USB_DEVICE(VENDOR_DLINK, PRODUCT_DWA160A) }, - { USB_DEVICE(0x0846, 0x9010) }, + { USB_DEVICE(VENDOR_NETGEAR, PRODUCT_WNDA3100) }, + { USB_DEVICE(VENDOR_NETGEAR, PRODUCT_WN111v2) }, { } /* Terminating entry */ };
Please submit patches via email, not via bugzilla. Documentation/SubmittingPatches has some guidelines. Suitable recipients for this patch are: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com> Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thanks.
I don't know the why of this policy... However I've submit this patch to these recipients. Andrew, note that your email address reject any mail!
> I don't know the why of this policy... a) Everybody's tools are set up for processing patches over email. When the patch is in bugzilla there are many manual steps involved. b) patches in bugzilla will not get the level of review which emailed patches receive. c) patches in bugzilla probably can't be discovered via google searches. > However I've submit this patch to these recipients. Andrew, note that your > email address reject any mail! That sounds bad. Please send the bounce message to akpm@kernel.org.
This bug is fixed, patch is in staging tree. However Otus driver will be deprecated in favor of ar9170 (when fully working).