Bug 9090
Summary: | Can we change the regression field to be per release? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Other | Reporter: | Martin J. Bligh (mbligh) |
Component: | Bug Tracker | Assignee: | Bug Me Administrator (bugme-admin) |
Status: | RESOLVED OBSOLETE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | alan |
Priority: | P1 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Kernel Version: | None | Subsystem: | |
Regression: | No | Bisected commit-id: |
Description
Martin J. Bligh
2007-09-27 09:29:17 UTC
(In reply to comment #0) ... > Is it possible to change it from a checkbox to a fixed dropdown with "2.6.0", > "2.6.1" .... "2.6.99", etc? ... So it would display one long list of all the versions from 0 to 99? That is a mighty big dropdown list. And in the future when we get past 99 how do we handle that, just keep adding more versions? Would you need to select more then one item from the list? bugme-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote: > http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=9090 > > > > > > ------- Comment #1 from kniht@us.ibm.com 2007-09-27 12:28 ------- > (In reply to comment #0) > ... >> Is it possible to change it from a checkbox to a fixed dropdown with >> "2.6.0", >> "2.6.1" .... "2.6.99", etc? > ... > > So it would display one long list of all the versions from 0 to 99? That is > a > mighty big dropdown list. Yeah ;-( I suppose until 2.6.50 would keep us going for a while. > And in the future when we get past 99 how do we > handle that, just keep adding more versions? Guess so. I don't see any other way to do it really -free text field would suck - even if we checked it afterwards, is just awkward to use. > Would you need to select more then one item from the list? Nope, just the one. M. |