Bug 14462
Summary: | Ultrabay drive not powered down during suspend - ThinkPad R61 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | ACPI | Reporter: | Daniel Gnoutcheff (daniel) |
Component: | Power-Sleep-Wake | Assignee: | acpi_power-sleep-wake |
Status: | CLOSED UNREPRODUCIBLE | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | lenb, rui.zhang |
Priority: | P1 | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Kernel Version: | Subsystem: | ||
Regression: | No | Bisected commit-id: | |
Attachments: |
dmesg
dmidecode |
Description
Daniel Gnoutcheff
2009-10-25 02:31:02 UTC
Created attachment 23517 [details]
dmesg
Created attachment 23518 [details]
dmidecode
please attach the acpidump output of your laptop. I tried to reproduce this bug on a T61 but failed. And I did find that the led beside the bay is still on if I didn't undock the bay before suspend. Then I use a power meter to see the power consumption in S3 state. 1. the power consumption is 1.7w ~ 1.8w if I suspend the laptop directly, 2. the power consumption is 1.7w ~ 1.8w, while it goes to 1.6w eventually, if I undock the ultrabay before suspend. so it seems that the power consumptions are almost the same in these two cases. (In reply to comment #0) > A workaround is to manually power-down the drive before suspend via > /sys/devices/platform/dock.2/undock. This does indeed reduce the power > consumed > while suspended). I don't know if I reproduced the problem you got on R61, but can you tell me why you think this reduces the power consumption please? does the battery work much longer than before? Hmm ... I am now unable to reproduce the high power consumption myself. :P While I don't have a power meter (wish I did ;), I have been using a hack that guesses the power usage by measuring battery charge before and after suspend. The hack lives at http://www.thinkwiki.org/wiki/ACPI_sleep_power_drain_test_script Some months ago I had used this script to estimate S3 power usage, and I seem to remember finding that S3 power dropped when I undocked the ultrabay, by 0.5-1.0 W or so. But then I ran out of free time so I couldn't file a bug report right away. Since then, I assumed that if the LED was still on, then the power drain was still there. I now see that this assumption seems to be incorrect. The aforementioned script now suggests a 0.8 W drain during S3, regardless of whether the drive is docked or not. So it seems that I must have misinterpreted the results the first time around. Either that, or the power drain has been fixed since I last checked, in which case, great work guys. :) Sorry about the noise. |