Bug 1129
Summary: | CONFIG_ACPI_RELAXED_AML is in 2.4 but not 2.6 | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | ACPI | Reporter: | Len Brown (lenb) |
Component: | ACPICA-Core | Assignee: | Len Brown (lenb) |
Status: | CLOSED CODE_FIX | ||
Severity: | normal | CC: | acpi-bugzilla |
Priority: | P2 | ||
Hardware: | i386 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Kernel Version: | 2.6.0-test3 | Subsystem: | |
Regression: | --- | Bisected commit-id: |
Description
Len Brown
2003-08-20 20:19:09 UTC
How old are the BIOSes on the machines RELAXED_AML fixes? Because we only do ACPI on >=2001 right? google lasts finds this message on LKML for an IBM ThinkPad R40 in August 2003, significantly newer than 2001. I think that Toshiba was the notorious one here, but they apparently fixed their BIOS at some point. ACPI_REPORT_WARNING(( "The ACPI AML in your computer contains errors, " "please nag the manufacturer to correct it.\n")); ACPI_REPORT_WARNING(( "Allowing relaxed access to fields; " "turn on CONFIG_ACPI_DEBUG for details.\n")); If we don't see this message anymore, we can remove the workaround; though that may prove a problem for old laptop users with no BIOS upgrade option who currently use acpi=force to get past the 2001 cutoff. As of 2.6.0-test6 this workaround is in both 2.6 and 2.4. |